The belief in a creative principle is understood as the observation of a necessary will, which makes possible all creation.
Freemasonry is not a religion , does not believe in revealed Gods
who direct the destinies of humans, and endow them with laws of
obligatory compliance, in Freemasonry, God is an idea that leads us to
believe in the need for an orderly system of existence, the reference
through which it is possible to transcend oneself, God is the way in
which each human being understands the energy that makes Creation
possible.
The freemasons , open and close the works dedicated "To the Glory of the Great Architect of the Universe " and those held in the lodges ; These works are really a cult of being supreme, where God is asked to bless the enclosure as a sacred place where his Name will be praised.
In that sense, Freemasonry, following its traditional method of
teaching (deductive), analyzes the universe and the perfection that
reigns in it and concludes that this cannot be the work of anyone other
than the "Great Architect of the Universe."
Freemasonry lacks a positive God, Freemasonry is a teaching system based on Symbolism and allegory.
And the Great Architect of the Universe, is one of his Symbols.
So that within Masonry, people of all ideology, of all faith, any
belief can come together as long as it is not denying the rest of ideas,
it is accepted by Freemasonry.
Therefore, atheism in Masonry is discussed, because the atheist in denying any idea of God, grants himself the possession of truths he does not possess.
The latest from the Remnant is stirring but I have some issues over what it signifies and the dubious call to #UniteTheClans.
Speculating on Francis' bona fides was over a long time ago for me and
it's now crystal clear what he is and what he is doing. Because of the
confusion and division trailing in his wake, the call to remedial action
now presents as much of a potential danger as Francis himself.
Pre-VatII there were many special purpose groups united in the One
Faith; post that Council, other groups formed such as the Lefevre
society and further groups splintered from that. Now, after six years of
Francis' machinations [ Machiavellian, at that], even more splinter
factions have arisen - and several are at each others throats to the
extent of threatened court actions [ apparently with disdain for the
Acts template for disputations]. These are the "clans" of which Matt and
Voris speak. Additionally, polemics has become loaded with divisive
terms like "Traditionalists" and "Papologists" and "Ultramontanists" and
"Clericalism", as well as accusations of old heresies, modernism,
Pelegianism, and so on. There are the formal organizations and Orders
too , not to mention the many media groups. On top of all these are the
various and opposing stances of the R&R, the Sedevacantists, the
Trads, the Liberals and so on. They are all in the ring like a tag-team
wrestling match, but no-one quite knows which side is on theirs and
apparently no one side is on any others. Thus, the #UniteTheClans call
has been made.
Here is my problem:
Yes, we are a
traditional church. But it is counter productive to adopt a label -
"Traditionalists" - spoken as though that is a separate movement. We are
of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church which is both material
and divine with Christ as our Head. END OF !!....... at least I wish it
was. Some claim that the Chair is vacant, others that Francis
legitimately occupies it, still others claim that the true pope is
Benedict. These positions are not likely to come together. Does that
really matter? For all I care, put the canon lawyers and cardinals in
the ring to fight it our. No, I hate the thought, but we have had a
vacant Seat before, we have had multiple popes before, and we have had
40 anti-popes before [ so they say]. The situation succinctly is that we
are leaderless. Face it and remain practicing. This call to unite the
clans sounds well and good, but my fear is that some power group will
form an ersatz or quasi church sect and, more especially, that it will
emanate from the U.S. There is no American Catholic Church [as many
often use that terminology], but there is the Catholic Church in
America. Words matter. This is a poignant point right now with Francis
throwing down the gauntlet and daring his detractors to break away [oh
yes, that's what he is doing] - that would suit his and Satan's plans
nicely. I am close to thinking that Francis and his "New Church" are
actually in schism now. And, if not now, then the Amazon will make it
clear. Let us keep our private philosophical position, but let it make
no difference to our practice of pewsitting and following Jesus as we
have always done, but with extra zeal in this crisis. The remedy is
prayer and penance. What penance could we possibly do to contribute to
the relief of such a maelstrom? Bear our Cross. And our Cross is the
anguish, loneliness, isolation and confusion that we are currently
experiencing.
From Pan Amazon Synod Watch, a few quotes from the Elites who would be the Masters Of The World. That sounds somewhat conspiratorial, but let them speak ........
5. Drastically Reduce or Even Eradicate the Human Race
Sir David Attenborough
“I’ve seen
wildlife all over the world under mounting human pressure and it’s not
just from human economy or technology – behind every threat is the
frightening explosion in human numbers… All serious environmentalists
know perfectly well that population growth, exploding in the 20th
century, has been a key driver of every environmental problem.” Sir
David Attenborough, director of The Optimum Population Trust writing in The Telegraph, April 14, 2009). If
steps are not taken to address global warming, within 30 to 40 years
“most of the people will have died and the rest of us will be cannibals …
A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from
present levels, would be ideal.” – Ted Turner, billionaire founder of
CNN and major UN donor on PBS’s Charlie Rose television program in 2008.
“Given the total, absolute, and final disappearance of Homo Sapiens,
then, not only would the Earth’s Community of Life continue to exist
but … the ending of the human epoch on Earth would most likely be
greeted with a hearty ‘Good riddance!’”— Paul W. Taylor, ethics
professor at City University, NYC, in Respect for Nature (Princeton Univ. Press, 1989, p. 115).
“I
see no solution to our ruination of Earth except for a drastic
reduction of the human population. David Foreman, ‘Earth First!’
spokesman, quoted by Gregg Easterbrook in The New Republic, April 30, 1990, p. 18. M. John Fayhee in Backpacker magazine,
September 1988, p. 22 quoted Mr. Foreman as saying: “…Man is no more
important than any other species … It may well take our extinction to
set things straight.”
“You think Hiroshima was bad, let me tell
you, mister, Hiroshima wasn’t bad enough!” – Faye Dunaway as the voice
of “Mother Earth/Gaia” in the 1991 WTBS series “Voice of the Planet.”
IPCC
warns the Amazon will turn into a desert: “The IPCC has concluded with
80% certainty that more than half of the Amazon rainforest could turn
into savannah. Climate change tends to the desertification and
salinization of areas suitable for farming. The semi-arid zone may turn
into an arid one leading to the extinction of several species of flora
and fauna.” – Agência Brasil, April 6, 2007.
“Mass
extinctions have served as huge reset buttons that dramatically changed
the diversity of species found in oceans all over the world… Some
scientists have speculated that effects of humans – from hunting to
climate change – are fueling another great mass extinction.”— Journalist
Jeremy Hsu.
“The ‘Meatless Monday’ campaign will have the support
of the [São Paulo] City’s Green Environmental Agency. The reason,
according to the department, is that a large-scale carnivorous diet ‘is
demonstrably unsustainable’ and brings no health benefits.”— São Paulo
City Hall Proposes Meat Boycott to “save the planet” (Folha de S. Paulo, Sept. 20, 2009).
6. Population Control and Totalitarianism
Jacques Attali
“History
teaches us that humanity evolves significantly only when it feels truly
afraid. We must build a world police, create world food reserves and
implement a global tax system. In this way we will be able to lay the
foundations of a true world government faster than if driven by mere
economic reasons.” Jacques Attali, French socialist and former
presidential adviser (Blog Conversation avec Jacques Attali).
“A
cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population
explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people … We must shift
our efforts from treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the
cancer… We must have population control … by compulsion if voluntary
methods fail” – Paul Ehrlich, in the book The Population Bomb (Ballantine Books, 1968).
John Holdren
“… A
Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population,
resources, and environment…could control the development,
administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources,
renewable or nonrenewable… [It] could have the power to control
pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such
freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes…The Regime might also be a logical
central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps
including…all food on the international market… [It] might be given
responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world
and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’
shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might
remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have
some power to enforce the agreed limits”—John Holdren, Assistant to
President Obama for Science and Technology (Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment).
Rowan Williams
“We must
support government coercion to enforce international protocols and speed
limits on motorways if we want the global economy not to collapse and
millions, billions of people to die.” – Rowan Williams, former Anglican
archbishop of Canterbury.
There is plenty of information on government and private methods of mind control. The reason for this post on the topic is that it has been reported by the mainstream NPR, the privately and publicly funded National Public Radio. This is shared from their article.
CIA chemist Sidney Gottlieb headed up the agency's
secret MK-ULTRA program, which was charged with developing a mind
control drug that could be weaponized against enemies.
Courtesy of the CIA
During the early period of the Cold War, the CIA became convinced
that communists had discovered a drug or technique that would allow them
to control human minds. In response, the CIA began its own secret
program, called MK-ULTRA, to search for a mind control drug that could
be weaponized against enemies.
MK-ULTRA, which operated from
the 1950s until the early '60s, was created and run by a chemist named
Sidney Gottlieb. Journalist Stephen Kinzer, who spent several years
investigating the program, calls the operation the "most sustained
search in history for techniques of mind control."
Some of
Gottlieb's experiments were covertly funded at universities and research
centers, Kinzer says, while others were conducted in American prisons
and in detention centers in Japan, Germany and the Philippines. Many of
his unwitting subjects endured psychological torture ranging from
electroshock to high doses of LSD, according to Kinzer's research.
"Gottlieb
wanted to create a way to seize control of people's minds, and he
realized it was a two-part process," Kinzer says. "First, you had to
blast away the existing mind. Second, you had to find a way to insert a
new mind into that resulting void. We didn't get too far on number two,
but he did a lot of work on number one."
Kinzer notes that the top-secret nature of Gottlieb's work makes
it impossible to measure the human cost of his experiments. "We don't
know how many people died, but a number did, and many lives were
permanently destroyed," he says.
Ultimately, Gottlieb concluded
that mind control was not possible. After MK-ULTRA shut down, he went
on to lead a CIA program that created poisons and high-tech gadgets for
spies to use.
Kinzer writes about Gottlieb and MK-ULTRA in his new book, Poisoner in Chief.
On how the CIA brought LSD to America
As
part of the search for drugs that would allow people to control the
human mind, CIA scientists became aware of the existence of LSD, and
this became an obsession for the early directors of MK-ULTRA. Actually,
the MK-ULTRA director, Sidney Gottlieb, can now be seen as the man who
brought LSD to America. He was the unwitting godfather of the entire LSD
counterculture.
In the early 1950s, he arranged for the CIA to
pay $240,000 to buy the world's entire supply of LSD. He brought this
to the United States, and he began spreading it around to hospitals,
clinics, prisons and other institutions, asking them, through bogus
foundations, to carry out research projects and find out what LSD was,
how people reacted to it and how it might be able to be used as a tool
for mind control.
Now, the people who volunteered for these
experiments and began taking LSD, in many cases, found it very
pleasurable. They told their friends about it. Who were those people? Ken Kesey, the author of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest,
got his LSD in an experiment sponsored by the CIA by MK-ULTRA, by
Sidney Gottlieb. So did Robert Hunter, the lyricist for the Grateful
Dead, which went on to become a great purveyor of LSD culture. Allen Ginsberg,
the poet who preached the value of the great personal adventure of
using LSD, got his first LSD from Sidney Gottlieb. Although, of course,
he never knew that name.
So the CIA brought LSD to America
unwittingly, and actually it's a tremendous irony that the drug that the
CIA hoped would be its key to controlling humanity actually wound up
fueling a generational rebellion that was dedicated to destroying
everything that the CIA held dear and defended. On how MK-ULTRA experimented on prisoners, including crime boss Whitey Bulger
Whitey
Bulger was one of the prisoners who volunteered for what he was told
was an experiment aimed at finding a cure for schizophrenia. As part of
this experiment, he was given LSD every day for more than a year. He
later realized that this had nothing to do with schizophrenia and he was
a guinea pig in a government experiment aimed at seeing what people's
long-term reactions to LSD was. Essentially, could we make a person lose
his mind by feeding him LSD every day over such a long period?
Bulger wrote afterward about his experiences, which he described
as quite horrific. He thought he was going insane. He wrote, "I was in
prison for committing a crime, but they committed a greater crime on
me." And towards the end of his life, Bulger came to realize the truth
of what had happened to him, and he actually told his friends that he
was going to find that doctor in Atlanta who was the head of that
experiment program in the penitentiary and go kill him. On the CIA hiring Nazi doctors and Japanese torturers to learn methods
The CIA mind control project, MK-ULTRA, was essentially a
continuation of work that began in Japanese and Nazi concentration
camps. Not only was it roughly based on those experiments, but the CIA
actually hired the vivisectionists and the torturers who had worked in
Japan and in Nazi concentration camps to come and explain what they had
found out so that we could build on their research.
For
example, Nazi doctors had conducted extensive experiments with mescaline
at the Dachau concentration camp, and the CIA was very interested in
figuring out whether mescaline could be the key to mind control that was
one of their big avenues of investigation. So they hired the Nazi
doctors who had been involved in that project to advise them.
Another
thing the Nazis provided was information about poison gases like sarin,
which is still being used. Nazi doctors came to America to Fort Detrick
in Maryland, which was the center of this project, to lecture to CIA
officers to tell them how long it took for people to die from sarin. On the more extreme experiments Gottlieb conducted overseas
Gottlieb
and the CIA established secret detention centers throughout Europe and
East Asia, particularly in Japan, Germany and the Philippines, which
were largely under American control in the period of the early '50s, and
therefore Gottlieb didn't have to worry about any legal entanglements
in these places. ...
CIA officers in Europe and Asia were
capturing enemy agents and others who they felt might be suspected
persons or were otherwise what they called "expendable." They would grab
these people and throw them into cells and then test all kinds of, not
just drug potions, but other techniques, like electroshock, extremes of
temperature, sensory isolation — all the meantime bombarding them with
questions, trying to see if they could break down resistance and find a
way to destroy the human ego. So these were projects designed not only
to understand the human mind but to figure out how to destroy it. And
that made Gottlieb, although in some ways a very compassionate person,
certainly the most prolific torturer of his generation. On how these experiments were unsupervised
[Gottlieb] operated almost completely without supervision. He had
sort of a checkoff from his titular boss and from his real boss, Richard
Helms, and from the CIA director, Allen Dulles. But none of them really
wanted to know what he was doing. This guy had a license to kill. He
was allowed to requisition human subjects across the United States and
around the world and subject them to any kind of abuse that he wanted,
even up to the level of it being fatal — yet nobody looked over his
shoulder. He never had to file serious reports to anybody. I think the
mentality must have been [that] this project is so important — mind
control, if it can be mastered, is the key to global world power. On how Gottlieb destroyed evidence about his experiments when he left the CIA
The
end of Gottlieb's career came in 1972, when his patron, Richard Helms,
who was then director of the CIA, was removed by [President Richard]
Nixon. Once Helms was gone, it was just a matter of time until Gottlieb
would be gone, and most important was that Helms was really the only
person at the CIA who had an idea of what Gottlieb had been doing. So as
they were both on their way out of the CIA, they agreed that they
should destroy all records of MK-ULTRA. Gottlieb actually drove out to
the CIA records center and ordered the archives to destroy boxes full of
MK-ULTRA records. ... However, it turns out that there were some
[records] found in other places; there was a depot for expense account
reports that had not been destroyed, and various other pieces of paper
remain. So there is enough out there to reconstruct some of what he did,
but his effort to wipe away his traces by destroying all those
documents in the early '70s was quite successful. Sam
Briger and Thea Chaloner produced and edited the audio of this
interview. Bridget Bentz, Molly Seavy-Nesper and Meghan Sullivan adapted
it for the Web.
DEPRAVITY WITHIN THE GAY COMMUNITY KNOWS NO BOUNDS, as many homosexuals
known as ‘Bug Chasers’ seek to have sex with men who are HIV positive,
so that they too may contract the ‘Gift’ of HIV in what they term “the
ultimate erotic experience”.
When I say that there are “many” who seek this perverted experience,
there are contested statistics put forward. Rolling Stone claims that
25% of gay men are bug chasers, while a study quoted in Wikipedia put
the number at 7.5%.
There is a documentary available on YouTube called THE GIFT, while here I
post a shorter interview [4 mins], with the producer ………..
Where innocent li’l ol’ me caught up with this suicidal activity was on
Reddit where, on a particular forum, gay men were putting out requests
to find other men with the ‘gift’. The language was the most vile and
sickening I can recall seeing where the ‘gifted’ and the ‘chasers’ were
exchanging what they would like to do with each other. And, no thanks to
the facebook friend who alerted me to it.
BUT, why do I bring this up now?
Alerting others to this activity will probably be of no consequence in
this post-modern world where relativism and situational ethics prevail
for the sake of “love being love” and Truth is now whatever you claim
it to be for yourself. But, the area where this issue does affect others
in the world of rights and redress is the world where our taxes are
getting poured into the health care of these intentionally sick people
with self-inflicted disease.
They will eventually need medical care and, even if this were given in a
public hospital with little cost to the afflicted, our taxes pay for
that hospital and all treatments given. Then, additionally, it’s fair to
say that they will choose medication, either as a cure or for the
easing of distressing symptoms. THIS IS MY POINT, since we are powerless
to restrict the activity itself and even to do so would impinge on
their ‘rights’. But we can do something about the public taxpayer
funding of treatment. What actually prompted this blog post was
yesterday’s article by the ABC which says ……..
“A ground-breaking HIV prevention drug has been approved for taxpayer
subsidy in Australia — marking a major milestone in the four decades
long battle against HIV and AIDS.
NO WAY JOSE !! We should and must not subsidize these people to the tune
of $1000 per treatment. We can and should put pressure on the
appropriate government Ministers to not fund treatments for this
self-inflicted disease. But, there’s a problem. Or two or three. The
taxpayer, remember, already funds HIV treatments in public hospitals for
HIV patients, some of whom have contracted the disease via
non-homosexual sex. Gays who have contracted the virus via sex know the
risks they have taken, yet they are subsidized without taxpayer protest.
Of course the argument will be made in relation to subsidized cancer
treatment for smokers. While that argument appears justified, it is not.
Why? Because for one thing [apart from the addiction angle], long term
smokers will have paid around $100,000 in taxes over aproximately 50
years and so have paid for their treatment by proxy. Another problem
inherent here is determining which infected person has contracted HIV
deliberately as a ‘bug chaser’, who should be excluded from receiving
subsidized care. This area is above my pay grade, so I will leave
readers to ponder and to take any action that they deem warranted. There
are many articles on bug chasing per se, and I will leave you with this
one ……….
ANIMAL RIGHTS ACTIVISTS SLAM TAYLOR SWIFT FOR APPEARING AT THE MELBOURNE CUP.
THE SPORT OF KINGS UNDER FIRE [again] ALONG WITH THE SYMBOLIC FRONT
PIECE FOR THE OCCULTIST MUSIC INDUSTRY "ENLIGHTENED ONES" [rarely]. ==========================================
You have to feel some sympathy for Taylor - the controlled symbol for a
degenerate mob of Satanic hustlers who have indoctrinated kids into the
New Age Movement [or tried their darndest]. Now she is under attack by
the usual suspects of activists, but one
suspects that Taylor will win out due to her fan base and army of
adoring indoctrinees and neophytes of the "Movement". Poor gal, she
previously suffered vitriolic abuse from the Left after going silent
upon Trump's election, even though she is a Democrat voter and shill for
LGBT [comes with the territory], racial activists, abortion, and all
those blah, blah causes. But that was because she hails from the redneck
base of country & western music.
Taylor was the main prop at the 2018 American Music Awards, singing "I
Did Something Bad" just to inculcate the philosophy in young minds that
bad is good. The trimmings included snakes galore, a giant image of a
Cobra, the expected hand signals to appease the Illuminati controllers,
the One-Eye gnostic symbol, and all the rest. Snakes you say?!! Yes, the
symbolic repeat of Eve's capitulation to Satan in the Garden Of Eden
[and get the adrenalin rush of the stage show and the monotone
mind-bending music that entraps young minds]. Kids hooked on that stuff
from the age of 10 to 30 gives them 20 years of brainwashing, no doubt.
But then we all have been subjected to toneless, monotonous vocal
masturbations since 1980, albeit from some wonderful vocalists - but the
Occult Industry will control what you hear - you hear!!
So, now
this poor puppet for the left marionettes will be the contradictory
front girl for the capitalists' big event in the Greatest Horse Race In
The World [apart from the Birdsville Cup, of course]. Conflict?......
Nah, not when it comes to $$$$$$$$$$$. We should just thank our lucky
astrological new age stars that Meat Loaf wasn't invited.
ALAN JONES, Aussie radio host, has been called a misogynist for suggesting the PM tell Jacinda Ardern, the PM of NZ, to "Put a Sock In It", or words to that effect. His critics are waging a war to have him deplatformed and are running a campaign with the stations advertisers to drop him. This is not about Jones or his character, this is about us; about our cultural expressions, our axioms, and our customs.
The attacks emanate from the usual suspects of the left, the cultural Marxists. As globalists, their general aims are to wreck our uniqueness of expression and customs to homogenize the population under the false and contradictory principle of multiculturalism which, in fact, destroys difference and diversity. We must be converted into a single, controlled mass of tolerant relativists who can be criminalized for offending the perpetually offended virtue-signalers and snowflakes of minorities and intersectionals so that their waving of the hammer and sickle is not objected to. They need to be freed up to hyper-sexualize our children, convince them that they were born in the wrong body, and develop their army of non-procreating homosexuals to reduce the population and rid the country of conservative Christians who stand in their way with their abominable, restrictive moralities and imaginary friend in the sky. A reckoning is coming.
An Aussie can run into the PM in the street and feel free to say: "G'day Scott, how about you pull your finger out with the coal mines, mate?" without being hauled off to the clink. No undue offense is intended and none would be taken. Were the PM a female, it would not be considered a misogynistic remark, unless you went by the name of Tony Abbott and glanced at your watch while she was speaking. Nor would it imply that his finger was in any particular location, literally. It's our way, our casualness, our egalitarianism. At least it has been for a few hundred years. Similarly, 'putting a sock in it' is a euphamism, it's metaphoric, but to the leftist flakes it's literal. They deliberately interpret such cheeky banalities either because they are ignorant products of a dumbed down educational process or else they weaponize their misinterpretation to stifle our axioms and to change our unique customs. It's their weapon of war against our ways.
This activism is being driven by Melbourne's soy boy Green Pollie, Adam the Bandt, and the page titled "F***ING MAD WITCHES" with their supposed 50,000 followers who have hounded the advertisers to desert the radio program. Many of them have complied in the way that only corporations with a political agenda can. These pretenders of femininity must be so self-loathing about their abilities to attract a male complement and compliment, that they adopt the persona of the Sistahood Of Aleister Crowley interbred with oily dregs of waste to spew their vitriol in vile language against mere euphamisms and metaphors. They are nothing but dykey SJW's devoid of morality and principle, judging by their postings. Such under-achievers are sour that they are not noticed and their narcissism is fulfilled in playing the "Bad Bitches" of the anti-hero genre to appear cooool, just ever so cool. "Look at moi, look at moi!" We have. You're ugly, very ugly, and your agenda is patent. Bugger orf, shove a sock in it, and go read some C.J.Dennis.
God in Freemasonry 
