Showing posts with label society. Show all posts
Showing posts with label society. Show all posts

Thursday, March 5, 2020

MUSIC IS CULTURE. OUR CULTURE IS DYING.

IN THIS OP-ED, BRIGGS ANALYZES THE DECLINE IN MUSIC. I HOPE TO FIND P.J.WATSON'S VIDEO DIATRIBE ON THE SUBJECT TO ADD TO THIS SUBJECT.

IT'S A CONTENTIOUS SUBJECT. THE YOUNGER GEN WOULDN'T AGREE WITH BRIGGS OR WATSON. THEY WOULD RETORT IN UNISON THAT: "EVERY GENERATION SAYS THE SAME THING; 'STUFF WAS BETTER IN THE OLDEN DAYS'"

It's a pity that Briggs doesn't present a reason for his hypothesis. I believe he would be qualified, but even if he weren't, a stab in the dark would be enlightening. I have a proposition on that, which is simply that every generation goes through the anarchist stage and, when combined with brainwashing and the intentional efforts by the industry elites to destroy Western civilization and its values that they have turned into a fine art since 1980, we have the present situation. But that's a long story. Let's just say that the young are being mind controlled as they believe their own lie that they wish to be non-conformists. You know what I mean - ditching school uniforms for example so that they can all wear ripped jeans and "F YOU" tee shirts. My personal gripe, and I am no musician, but I do have ears and preferences, is that the wonderful vocal talents of today are vocal masturbators in the sense that there is a certain narcissism to their warbling. That can be witnessed at Christmas Carols public performances where every vocalist wants to warble their way through every musical arrangement to alter it as much as possible from its traditional form. The classical composers just weren't good enough. And, don't get me started on church music where, especially in the Catholic liturgy, magnificent hymns have been replaced by folksie petitioning rather than praise to the Lord's Glory. There again, were you to know my taste in modern/pop music you would take me for a hypocrite. To any charge I would say that pop has declined since 1980 for, yes, I liked my pre-1980 rock. Briggs critiques music on the basis of its repetitiveness, for one thing, and he would lambast me if he knew that I quite liked Billy Thorpe's version of "Mashed Potata, Yeah", and one contributing reason for my liking was that it remains the only song for which I know all the lyrics since they consist of just those 3 words. Here's Briggs.........


Statistician to the Stars!

Proof That Music Is Growing Worse

This post originally ran 28 September 2011, and is in the top 20 of all posts. If I ever do it again, there is much I’d expand on. The basic idea is sound. What has become of popular music isn’t.
In 1946, Perry Como sang:
Alone from night to night you’ll find me,
Too weak to break the chains that bind me,
I need no shackles to remind me,
I’m just a prisoner of love!
The song was Prisoner Of Love, penned by Russ Columbo, Clarence Gaskill & Leo Robin. It was Billboard‘s number one song for all of that year.
The lyricism barely extends past that found on a greeting card, but at least the words are intelligible, standard English, and are coupled with music that mates naturally. The song contains 166 words, with a two-quatrain refrain that is sung twice. Overall, 43% of the words in the song are unique.
By 2010, the top song of the year was Tik Tok, sang by somebody called Kesha (who, your author has learned, occasionally replaces the “s” in her name with a dollar sign; in the video of the song linked, the young lady wakes up in the bathtub from the prior evening’s debauchery: how proud her parents must be):
I’m talking about errybody getting crunk, crunk
Boys trying to touch my junk, junk
Gonna smack him if he getting too drunk, drunk
Now, now we goin’ ’til they kick us out, out
Or the police shut us down, down
Police shut us down, down
Po-po shut us down
The English has been replaced by transient slang, the lyricism now trivial. But Kesha does manage to slip in an allusion to female genitalia, a feat which Como never attained. The major refrain repeats six times; a minor one, twice. There are three times as many words in Tik Tok (510) than in Como’s hit, but because of the multiple repetitions, only 28% of them are unique.
In 1948, the top tune was Francis Craig & Kermit Goell’s Near You. This was a standard big band composition: the majority of the tune is instrumental, the vocalist there only to provide contrast. Craig’s playing was sappy but light. As often happened with these standards, the song was taken by others and later turned into something better. Because of the brevity of the vocals, 73% of the lyrics were unique.
In contrast, the 2009 top hit, Boom Boom Pow by the Black Eyed Peas was unsalvageable, because there is no tune to improve. The song consists in a male vocalist repeatedly intoning “Boom boom boom” and “Shi**in’ on yall you with the (Boom boom)” over an even more repetitive beat created on some sort of machine which, all evidence indicates, was broken. A generously counted 23% of the words are unique.
If a pop song had only one word which was repeated multiple times, where it was used like a blunt instrument, over its three-minute lifetime, the chance that that song is bad would be high. Imagine a monotonic single-word chant. The example works with phrases, too. Repeat, for example, “I wanna hold your hand” for two solid minutes, as the Beatles did in 1964, and you’ll have the idea.
Limited vocabulary does not guarantee awfulness: if words aren’t used as a words, but as a means for the vocalist to turn her voice into a raw instrument, then the song can be good or at least passable, as this counter example demonstrates.
A song with lyrics that are not repetitive is more likely to be good, or at least interesting. It increases the chance of a clear story, or message, the possibility of a beginning, middle, and end. Not that pop music, being popular, will ever be accused of sublimity. Strike that: never was accused of sublimity. Nowadays, we are told we are surrounded by genius. When critics are presented with less, they find more to praise.
Of course, one could sing the dictionary for three minutes, a trick which maximizes unique words, but whose results will be atrocious.
Pop music's decline
The picture demonstrates clearly that the lyrics in the top pop songs of the year are being more repetitive through time. On average. In the sense just given, this means pop music is growing worse.
Of the three songs with the lowest proportion of unique words, two are by the Beatles. 1964’s I Want Hold Your Hand (21%), and 1968’s Hey Jude (18%), which featured the lyric “na na na, na na na” sang 40 times. Simple to digest, no? The other worst offender was a song called Too Close by Next in 1998 (18%), which featured the subtle refrain:
Baby when we’re grinding
I get so excited
Ooh, how I like it
I try but I can’t fight it
Oh, you’re dancing real clos
Cuz it’s real, real slow
You’re making it hard for me
There are gaps in the picture. All are instrumentals. The first is 1948: Twelfth Street Rag1 by Pee Wee Hunt. The last time was 1962: the extraordinary melancholy Stranger on the Shore by Acker Bilk, a favorite of the late and lamented Danny Stiles. Tunes like this one, are a nearly forgotten memory.
There hasn’t been an instrumental topping the charts in nearly 50 years. And there are other indications that people are growing less tolerant of music. The tunes in the 1940s and 1950s had a higher proportion of music to words. But by the 2000s, even considering the slight average increase in song time, lyrics—if they can be so generously called that—are crammed into songs. Just look at the rapid increase in the number of words per hit song.
Pop music's decline
Pause to consider this picture. Word count is soaring, but word uniqueness is dropping. We are rapidly approaching the monotonic chant mentioned above. Take this example from 2008, Low by Flo Rida. Featuring, lest we forget, T-Pain. The refrain comprises nearly the entire song—though Flo does slip in the words “pornography” and “Glock”, and we are informed the object of desire has a “Tattoo above her crack”:
Apple Bottom Jeans (Jeans)
Boots with the fur (With the fur)
The whole club lookin at her
She hit the floor (She hit the floor)
Next thing you know
Shawty got low low low low low low low low
No statistics are needed to demonstrate the increase in crudity, decrease in intelligibility, and the now near lack of musicality, the complete lack of beauty. Prisoner Of Love wasn’t art, but it tried to be. Beauty, or anything resembling it, is now ruthlessly expunged. The only emotions celebrated are raw, brustish, animal-like. Lyrics used to tell stories, or express desire, but not just for the sake of it. Reasons for the desire were required.
The most rebelliousness song before rock and roll struck was in 1951, where in the top hit of the year Nat King Cole could lament that “They try to tell us we’re too young.” By 2004, Usher (featuring Lil Jon & Ludacris) could announce in that year’s top song, “These women al on the prowl, if you hold the head steady I’m a milk the cow.”
The word “love” used to make regular appearances in popular tunes. It’s there in Low, but to express the idea, “I love women exposed.” It also found it’s way into 2003’s biggest hit In Da Club by 50 Cent, who warbled, “I’m into having sex, I ain’t into making love.” He also used the vulgar word for the same act. The Beatles’s first hit song was more repetitive, but it at least expressed a sweet sentiment.
Another element lacking in modern efforts is complexity, which is the converse of repetitiveness. Consider the top tune of 1954, Kitty Kallen singing Little Things Mean A Lot. It’s not Verdi, but a whole suite of different instruments, moods, harmonies, decibel levels can be heard.
Then try to listen to 2002’s top offering How You Remind Me by Nickleback, far from the worst of the lot. There’s hardly any difference in tone from start to finish, the sounds are muddled, the voice filtered. It is mushy and limited. It is a much simpler song. And still to come were Boom Boom Pow and Tik Tok.
People now like their music to do away with all necessity of thought or contemplation. If a guiding, demanding beat isn’t there to lead them obediently through a tune, they don’t like it. Compare the original version of the (not top hit) Nat King Cole’s rendition of Lush Life with this highly praised “re-mix.” In comes repetition, out goes subtlety. The song has been turned into pablum. The depth of Billy Strayhorn is too much for the modern mind.
What’s to come? If the trends we’ve noted continue, we can look forward to an increase in crudity, lyrics with blatant narcissism, a further weakening of the demand that a song contain music, a return to neolithic simplicity. The top song by 2020 will be titled, Sex, a work with a damning, unchanging beat, with lyric comprised of the lone word “Sex,” repeated until the matter inside the listener’s skull has been nicely puréed.
—————————————————————————————–
1Only the Lord knows how the person who posted this song to Youtube matched that graphic.
Your authors’ number two son compiled the songs and lyrics. 

AND I FOUND WATTO'S VIDEO WHICH YOU MAY FIND LESS DRY THAN BRIGGS ....

 

Saturday, February 29, 2020

A CHILD WILL GUEST STAR AT THE DRAG QUEEN EXPO IN MELBOURNE.

THIS IS WHAT IT HAS COME TO. I won't say anything inflammatory here because this blog will be shared to the facebook page "Right to speak", so to mitigate against another ban, I re-post the 'bare' facts from the site BINARY.

The facebook page "Right to speak" can be seen here >

https://www.facebook.com/Righttospeakaustralia/

12-year-old Drag Queen coming to Australia

Desmond is Amazing, a 12yr old drag queen, is coming to Australia. He will be a special guest at the Melbourne Drag Queen Expo in August.
Still only a child, 12yr old Desmond will be sharing the stage with many adult entertainers.
The featured Drag Queens for the expo specialise in sexually explicit content. They perform in bars and 18+ spaces – and that’s where they belong. Adult entertainers are of adults.
One has to ask then, what business does a 12-year-old have with such performers? Why is the expo featuring a 12 year old? This will attract attention from other kids as well. You can be sure they will check out the social media profiles of some of the Drag Queens. What they will discover is drag queens are not for kids.
Here is just a sample:
Alaska Thudnerf*ck – The name says it all and the bio says: A well-traveled, campy extraterrestrial does have her perks and her irritations. Transients and drifters are directed to the nearest black hole via her pre-screw-you GPS navigation, and drug-addled layabouts are allowed to create their own black holes. She promises to upload each and every one into the system. How dangerous can Thunderfuck be? As dangerous as a black hole.
Archie Arsenic –When kids visit his Facebook page they will be confronted with image after image of him dressed as the devil – topless, with glitter over the nipples, in bondage style lingerie, being sexually provocative and playing with fire. Definitely 18+ material there.
Weird Alice Yankadic: FB page features sexualised cartoons and images of him with breasts being fondled by himself and others in the bed.
Sharon Needles: From the performers webpage:  “Sharon Needles is the most paranoid, disgusting, vile, lewd, corrupt, and obscene bitch I’ve ever met. And I mean that in a good way. Basically, there are three human needs in life: Sex, Scotch, and Sharon Needles.”
Bible Girl 666 is described as “Internet reality trash”
D Flowers advocates political activism and wants to promote the gender fluid agenda. “Anyone who breaks the gender binary is not only making a political statement; they are also making social, historical, and economical statements as well. We all know that heterosexual society is rather binary, and drag does tend to break down a lot of the boundaries and create visceral reactions. I feel it can expose individuals to the idea that gender is a fluid, social construct.”
Dwight Trash: His bio Instagram describes him as the King of Camp Cowboy Trash.He is “Here to confuse and unsettle the masses.” And is “The one your mother warned you about.”
Penny Cillin: one of his first images on Instagram is captioned “Solid gold d*ckhead”
Kane Enable: contains adult content on Instagram: “Still finding glitter on my neck, my back, in my p*ssy and my crack.”
Cherylyn Barnes: Social media: “this is for all mi lost biches xxxxx Pussi kiss.”
Kirralie Smith, Binary spokeswoman, is concerned about the trend to involve children in adult entertainment.
“Drag queens are not for kids. They are adult entertainers who perform for adults. Why on earth would anyone want to expose children to hypersexualised men, dressed as stereotyped sexualised women? Children who follow Desmond will no doubt investigate the social media pages of the other drag queens. Their content is definitely not for kids!”

Sunday, September 15, 2019

THE GLOBALIST POPULATION PLAN

From Pan Amazon Synod Watch, a few quotes from the Elites who would be the Masters Of The World. That sounds somewhat conspiratorial, but let them speak ........

Environmental Madness (XV)

5. Drastically Reduce or Even Eradicate the Human Race

Sir David Attenborough
“I’ve seen wildlife all over the world under mounting human pressure and it’s not just from human economy or technology – behind every threat is the frightening explosion in human numbers… All serious environmentalists know perfectly well that population growth, exploding in the 20th century, has been a key driver of every environmental problem.” Sir David Attenborough, director of The Optimum Population Trust writing in The Telegraph, April 14, 2009).
Ted TurnerIf steps are not taken to address global warming, within 30 to 40 years “most of the people will have died and the rest of us will be cannibals … A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” – Ted Turner, billionaire founder of CNN and major UN donor on PBS’s Charlie Rose television program in 2008.
“Given the total, absolute, and final disappearance of Homo Sapiens, then, not only would the Earth’s Community of Life continue to exist but … the ending of the human epoch on Earth would most likely be greeted with a hearty ‘Good riddance!’”— Paul W. Taylor, ethics professor at City University, NYC, in Respect for Nature (Princeton Univ. Press, 1989, p. 115).
“I see no solution to our ruination of Earth except for a drastic reduction of the human population. David Foreman, ‘Earth First!’ spokesman, quoted by Gregg Easterbrook in The New Republic, April 30, 1990, p. 18. M. John Fayhee in Backpacker magazine, September 1988, p. 22 quoted Mr. Foreman as saying: “…Man is no more important than any other species … It may well take our extinction to set things straight.”
“You think Hiroshima was bad, let me tell you, mister, Hiroshima wasn’t bad enough!” – Faye Dunaway as the voice of “Mother Earth/Gaia” in the 1991 WTBS series “Voice of the Planet.”
IPCC warns the Amazon will turn into a desert: “The IPCC has concluded with 80% certainty that more than half of the Amazon rainforest could turn into savannah. Climate change tends to the desertification and salinization of areas suitable for farming. The semi-arid zone may turn into an arid one leading to the extinction of several species of flora and fauna.” – Agência Brasil, April 6, 2007.
“Mass extinctions have served as huge reset buttons that dramatically changed the diversity of species found in oceans all over the world… Some scientists have speculated that effects of humans – from hunting to climate change – are fueling another great mass extinction.”— Journalist Jeremy Hsu.
“The ‘Meatless Monday’ campaign will have the support of the [São Paulo] City’s Green Environmental Agency. The reason, according to the department, is that a large-scale carnivorous diet ‘is demonstrably unsustainable’ and brings no health benefits.”— São Paulo City Hall Proposes Meat Boycott to “save the planet” (Folha de S. Paulo, Sept. 20, 2009).

6. Population Control and Totalitarianism

Jacques Attali
“History teaches us that humanity evolves significantly only when it feels truly afraid. We must build a world police, create world food reserves and implement a global tax system. In this way we will be able to lay the foundations of a true world government faster than if driven by mere economic reasons.” Jacques Attali, French socialist and former presidential adviser (Blog Conversation avec Jacques Attali).
“A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people … We must shift our efforts from treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer… We must have population control … by compulsion if voluntary methods fail” – Paul Ehrlich, in the book The Population Bomb (Ballantine Books, 1968).
John Holdren
“… A Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment…could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable… [It] could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes…The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including…all food on the international market… [It] might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits”—John Holdren, Assistant to President Obama for Science and Technology (Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment).
Rowan Williams
Rowan Williams
 “We must support government coercion to enforce international protocols and speed limits on motorways if we want the global economy not to collapse and millions, billions of people to die.” – Rowan Williams, former Anglican archbishop of Canterbury.

Thursday, September 12, 2019

MIND CONTROL

There is plenty of information on government and private methods of mind control. The reason for this post on the topic is that it has been reported by the mainstream NPR, the privately and publicly funded National Public Radio. This is shared from their article.

https://www.npr.org/2019/09/09/758989641/the-cias-secret-quest-for-mind-control-torture-lsd-and-a-poisoner-in-chief

The CIA's Secret Quest For Mind Control: Torture, LSD And A 'Poisoner In Chief'

CIA chemist Sidney Gottlieb headed up the agency's secret MK-ULTRA program, which was charged with developing a mind control drug that could be weaponized against enemies.
Courtesy of the CIA
During the early period of the Cold War, the CIA became convinced that communists had discovered a drug or technique that would allow them to control human minds. In response, the CIA began its own secret program, called MK-ULTRA, to search for a mind control drug that could be weaponized against enemies.
MK-ULTRA, which operated from the 1950s until the early '60s, was created and run by a chemist named Sidney Gottlieb. Journalist Stephen Kinzer, who spent several years investigating the program, calls the operation the "most sustained search in history for techniques of mind control."
Some of Gottlieb's experiments were covertly funded at universities and research centers, Kinzer says, while others were conducted in American prisons and in detention centers in Japan, Germany and the Philippines. Many of his unwitting subjects endured psychological torture ranging from electroshock to high doses of LSD, according to Kinzer's research.
"Gottlieb wanted to create a way to seize control of people's minds, and he realized it was a two-part process," Kinzer says. "First, you had to blast away the existing mind. Second, you had to find a way to insert a new mind into that resulting void. We didn't get too far on number two, but he did a lot of work on number one."
Kinzer notes that the top-secret nature of Gottlieb's work makes it impossible to measure the human cost of his experiments. "We don't know how many people died, but a number did, and many lives were permanently destroyed," he says.
Ultimately, Gottlieb concluded that mind control was not possible. After MK-ULTRA shut down, he went on to lead a CIA program that created poisons and high-tech gadgets for spies to use.
Kinzer writes about Gottlieb and MK-ULTRA in his new book, Poisoner in Chief.

Interview highlights

On how the CIA brought LSD to America
As part of the search for drugs that would allow people to control the human mind, CIA scientists became aware of the existence of LSD, and this became an obsession for the early directors of MK-ULTRA. Actually, the MK-ULTRA director, Sidney Gottlieb, can now be seen as the man who brought LSD to America. He was the unwitting godfather of the entire LSD counterculture.
In the early 1950s, he arranged for the CIA to pay $240,000 to buy the world's entire supply of LSD. He brought this to the United States, and he began spreading it around to hospitals, clinics, prisons and other institutions, asking them, through bogus foundations, to carry out research projects and find out what LSD was, how people reacted to it and how it might be able to be used as a tool for mind control.
Now, the people who volunteered for these experiments and began taking LSD, in many cases, found it very pleasurable. They told their friends about it. Who were those people? Ken Kesey, the author of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, got his LSD in an experiment sponsored by the CIA by MK-ULTRA, by Sidney Gottlieb. So did Robert Hunter, the lyricist for the Grateful Dead, which went on to become a great purveyor of LSD culture. Allen Ginsberg, the poet who preached the value of the great personal adventure of using LSD, got his first LSD from Sidney Gottlieb. Although, of course, he never knew that name.
So the CIA brought LSD to America unwittingly, and actually it's a tremendous irony that the drug that the CIA hoped would be its key to controlling humanity actually wound up fueling a generational rebellion that was dedicated to destroying everything that the CIA held dear and defended.
On how MK-ULTRA experimented on prisoners, including crime boss Whitey Bulger
Whitey Bulger was one of the prisoners who volunteered for what he was told was an experiment aimed at finding a cure for schizophrenia. As part of this experiment, he was given LSD every day for more than a year. He later realized that this had nothing to do with schizophrenia and he was a guinea pig in a government experiment aimed at seeing what people's long-term reactions to LSD was. Essentially, could we make a person lose his mind by feeding him LSD every day over such a long period?
Bulger wrote afterward about his experiences, which he described as quite horrific. He thought he was going insane. He wrote, "I was in prison for committing a crime, but they committed a greater crime on me." And towards the end of his life, Bulger came to realize the truth of what had happened to him, and he actually told his friends that he was going to find that doctor in Atlanta who was the head of that experiment program in the penitentiary and go kill him.
On the CIA hiring Nazi doctors and Japanese torturers to learn methods
The CIA mind control project, MK-ULTRA, was essentially a continuation of work that began in Japanese and Nazi concentration camps. Not only was it roughly based on those experiments, but the CIA actually hired the vivisectionists and the torturers who had worked in Japan and in Nazi concentration camps to come and explain what they had found out so that we could build on their research.
For example, Nazi doctors had conducted extensive experiments with mescaline at the Dachau concentration camp, and the CIA was very interested in figuring out whether mescaline could be the key to mind control that was one of their big avenues of investigation. So they hired the Nazi doctors who had been involved in that project to advise them.
Another thing the Nazis provided was information about poison gases like sarin, which is still being used. Nazi doctors came to America to Fort Detrick in Maryland, which was the center of this project, to lecture to CIA officers to tell them how long it took for people to die from sarin.
On the more extreme experiments Gottlieb conducted overseas
Gottlieb and the CIA established secret detention centers throughout Europe and East Asia, particularly in Japan, Germany and the Philippines, which were largely under American control in the period of the early '50s, and therefore Gottlieb didn't have to worry about any legal entanglements in these places. ...
CIA officers in Europe and Asia were capturing enemy agents and others who they felt might be suspected persons or were otherwise what they called "expendable." They would grab these people and throw them into cells and then test all kinds of, not just drug potions, but other techniques, like electroshock, extremes of temperature, sensory isolation — all the meantime bombarding them with questions, trying to see if they could break down resistance and find a way to destroy the human ego. So these were projects designed not only to understand the human mind but to figure out how to destroy it. And that made Gottlieb, although in some ways a very compassionate person, certainly the most prolific torturer of his generation.
On how these experiments were unsupervised
[Gottlieb] operated almost completely without supervision. He had sort of a checkoff from his titular boss and from his real boss, Richard Helms, and from the CIA director, Allen Dulles. But none of them really wanted to know what he was doing. This guy had a license to kill. He was allowed to requisition human subjects across the United States and around the world and subject them to any kind of abuse that he wanted, even up to the level of it being fatal — yet nobody looked over his shoulder. He never had to file serious reports to anybody. I think the mentality must have been [that] this project is so important — mind control, if it can be mastered, is the key to global world power.
On how Gottlieb destroyed evidence about his experiments when he left the CIA
The end of Gottlieb's career came in 1972, when his patron, Richard Helms, who was then director of the CIA, was removed by [President Richard] Nixon. Once Helms was gone, it was just a matter of time until Gottlieb would be gone, and most important was that Helms was really the only person at the CIA who had an idea of what Gottlieb had been doing. So as they were both on their way out of the CIA, they agreed that they should destroy all records of MK-ULTRA. Gottlieb actually drove out to the CIA records center and ordered the archives to destroy boxes full of MK-ULTRA records. ... However, it turns out that there were some [records] found in other places; there was a depot for expense account reports that had not been destroyed, and various other pieces of paper remain. So there is enough out there to reconstruct some of what he did, but his effort to wipe away his traces by destroying all those documents in the early '70s was quite successful.
Sam Briger and Thea Chaloner produced and edited the audio of this interview. Bridget Bentz, Molly Seavy-Nesper and Meghan Sullivan adapted it for the Web.

THE GAY "GIFT OF DEATH"


DEPRAVITY WITHIN THE GAY COMMUNITY KNOWS NO BOUNDS, as many homosexuals known as ‘Bug Chasers’ seek to have sex with men who are HIV positive, so that they too may contract the ‘Gift’ of HIV in what they term “the ultimate erotic experience”.
When I say that there are “many” who seek this perverted experience, there are contested statistics put forward. Rolling Stone claims that 25% of gay men are bug chasers, while a study quoted in Wikipedia put the number at 7.5%.
There is a documentary available on YouTube called THE GIFT, while here I post a shorter interview [4 mins], with the producer ………..
The wikipedia article on it is here ……..
Where innocent li’l ol’ me caught up with this suicidal activity was on Reddit where, on a particular forum, gay men were putting out requests to find other men with the ‘gift’. The language was the most vile and sickening I can recall seeing where the ‘gifted’ and the ‘chasers’ were exchanging what they would like to do with each other. And, no thanks to the facebook friend who alerted me to it.
BUT, why do I bring this up now?
Alerting others to this activity will probably be of no consequence in this post-modern world where relativism and situational ethics prevail for the sake of  “love being love” and Truth is now whatever you claim it to be for yourself. But, the area where this issue does affect others in the world of rights and redress is the world where our taxes are getting poured into the health care of these intentionally sick people with self-inflicted disease.
They will eventually need medical care and, even if this were given in a public hospital with little cost to the afflicted, our taxes pay for that hospital and all treatments given. Then, additionally, it’s fair to say that they will choose medication, either as a cure or for the easing of distressing symptoms. THIS IS MY POINT, since we are powerless to restrict the activity itself and even to do so would impinge on their ‘rights’. But we can do something about the public taxpayer funding of treatment. What actually prompted this blog post was yesterday’s article by the ABC which says ……..
“A ground-breaking HIV prevention drug has been approved for taxpayer subsidy in Australia — marking a major milestone in the four decades long battle against HIV and AIDS.
PrEP or pre-exposure prophylaxis has been recommended for listing on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme by a panel of experts.
The Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt previously promised government funding for the drug if approved by the committee.
The decision is expected to see the over-the-counter cost of the drug drop from up to $1,000 to about $40.
Victorian AIDS Council CEO Simon Ruth said it should be available by the middle of the year from any doctor or pharmacy.”
NO WAY JOSE !! We should and must not subsidize these people to the tune of $1000 per treatment. We can and should put pressure on the appropriate government Ministers to not fund treatments for this self-inflicted disease. But, there’s a problem. Or two or three. The taxpayer, remember, already funds HIV treatments in public hospitals for HIV patients, some of whom have contracted the disease via non-homosexual sex. Gays who have contracted the virus via sex know the risks they have taken, yet they are subsidized without taxpayer protest. Of course the argument will be made in relation to subsidized cancer treatment for smokers. While that argument appears justified, it is not. Why? Because for one thing [apart from the addiction angle], long term smokers will have paid around $100,000 in taxes over aproximately 50 years and so have paid for their treatment by proxy. Another problem inherent here is determining which infected person has contracted HIV deliberately as a ‘bug chaser’, who should be excluded from receiving subsidized care. This area is above my pay grade, so I will leave readers to ponder and to take any action that they deem warranted. There are many articles on bug chasing per se, and I will leave you with this one ……….
Kyrie Eleison.

TAYLOR SWIFT IS THE MEAT IN THE SANDWICH

 
ANIMAL RIGHTS ACTIVISTS SLAM TAYLOR SWIFT FOR APPEARING AT THE MELBOURNE CUP.
THE SPORT OF KINGS UNDER FIRE [again] ALONG WITH THE SYMBOLIC FRONT PIECE FOR THE OCCULTIST MUSIC INDUSTRY "ENLIGHTENED ONES" [rarely].
==========================================
You have to feel some sympathy for Taylor - the controlled symbol for a degenerate mob of Satanic hustlers who have indoctrinated kids into the New Age Movement [or tried their darndest]. Now she is under attack by the usual suspects of activists, but one suspects that Taylor will win out due to her fan base and army of adoring indoctrinees and neophytes of the "Movement". Poor gal, she previously suffered vitriolic abuse from the Left after going silent upon Trump's election, even though she is a Democrat voter and shill for LGBT [comes with the territory], racial activists, abortion, and all those blah, blah causes. But that was because she hails from the redneck base of country & western music.
Taylor was the main prop at the 2018 American Music Awards, singing "I Did Something Bad" just to inculcate the philosophy in young minds that bad is good. The trimmings included snakes galore, a giant image of a Cobra, the expected hand signals to appease the Illuminati controllers, the One-Eye gnostic symbol, and all the rest. Snakes you say?!! Yes, the symbolic repeat of Eve's capitulation to Satan in the Garden Of Eden [and get the adrenalin rush of the stage show and the monotone mind-bending music that entraps young minds]. Kids hooked on that stuff from the age of 10 to 30 gives them 20 years of brainwashing, no doubt. But then we all have been subjected to toneless, monotonous vocal masturbations since 1980, albeit from some wonderful vocalists - but the Occult Industry will control what you hear - you hear!!
So, now this poor puppet for the left marionettes will be the contradictory front girl for the capitalists' big event in the Greatest Horse Race In The World [apart from the Birdsville Cup, of course]. Conflict?...... Nah, not when it comes to $$$$$$$$$$$. We should just thank our lucky astrological new age stars that Meat Loaf wasn't invited.



Taylor Swift, Queen of the 2018 American Music AwardsTaylor Swift, Queen of the 2018 American Music Awards

Friday, August 23, 2019

THE JONES AFFAIR IS OUR AFFAIR




ALAN JONES, Aussie radio host, has been called a misogynist for suggesting the PM tell Jacinda Ardern, the PM of NZ, to "Put a Sock In It", or words to that effect. His critics are waging a war to have him deplatformed and are running a campaign with the stations advertisers to drop him. This is not about Jones or his character, this is about us; about our cultural expressions, our axioms, and our customs.

The attacks emanate from the usual suspects of the left, the cultural Marxists. As globalists, their general aims are to wreck our uniqueness of expression and customs to homogenize the population under the false and contradictory principle of multiculturalism which, in fact, destroys difference and diversity. We must be converted into a single, controlled mass of tolerant relativists who can be criminalized for offending the perpetually offended virtue-signalers and snowflakes of minorities and intersectionals so that their waving of the hammer and sickle is not objected to. They need to be freed up to hyper-sexualize our children, convince them that they were born in the wrong body, and develop their army of non-procreating homosexuals to reduce the population and rid the country of conservative Christians who stand in their way with their abominable, restrictive moralities and imaginary friend in the sky.
Image result for free pic alan jones  A reckoning is coming.

An Aussie can run into the PM in the street and feel free to say: "G'day Scott, how about you pull your finger out with the coal mines, mate?" without being hauled off to the clink. No undue offense is intended and none would be taken. Were the PM a female, it would not be considered a misogynistic remark, unless you went by the name of Tony Abbott and glanced at your watch while she was speaking. Nor would it imply that his finger was in any particular location, literally. It's our way, our casualness, our egalitarianism. At least it has been for a few hundred years. Similarly, 'putting a sock in it' is a euphamism, it's metaphoric, but to the leftist flakes it's literal. They deliberately interpret such cheeky banalities either because they are ignorant products of a dumbed down educational process or else they weaponize their misinterpretation to stifle our axioms and to change our unique customs. It's their weapon of war against our ways.

This activism is being driven by Melbourne's soy boy Green Pollie, Adam the Bandt, and the page titled "F***ING MAD WITCHES" with their supposed 50,000 followers who have hounded the advertisers to desert the radio program. Many of them have complied in the way that only corporations with a political agenda can. These pretenders of femininity must be so self-loathing about their abilities to attract a male complement and compliment, that they adopt the persona of the Sistahood Of Aleister Crowley interbred with oily dregs of waste to spew their vitriol in vile language against mere euphamisms and metaphors. They are nothing but dykey SJW's devoid of morality and principle, judging by their postings. Such under-achievers are sour that they are not noticed and their narcissism is fulfilled in playing the "Bad Bitches" of the anti-hero genre to appear cooool, just ever so cool. "Look at moi, look at moi!" We have. You're ugly, very ugly, and your agenda is patent. Bugger orf, shove a sock in it, and go read some C.J.Dennis.

Friday, April 12, 2019

CROSSING THE JORDAN PETERSON

https://namnow.wordpress.com/2018/02/02/crossing-the-jordan-peterson/

Prof. Jordan Peterson, psychologist, has become flavor of the decade for the conservative political right with his arguments of reason and logic that decimate the wooly theories of the prog-libs and cultural Marxist post modernists. The catalyst for his rise to prominence on social media was his refusal to indulge in the enforced terming of pronouns for the gender fluid. While in reality there are plenty of such sensible commentators about, it is to his good fortune that he has broken through into the public arena where others remain in relative obscurity  –  it’s not as if reason and logic have just been discovered  –  and those others are considered by the mainstream to be far right nutters or even religious nerds who are not willing disciples of the god of Cool. And that,  – Cool  – is the light in which Peterson is apparently being seen by, of all demographic groups, generation Z. A good thing as far as it goes.
The reasonable average Joe and even your mildly activist keyboard warrior knows bullshit when he or she sees it, but articulating their position so often falls short. Enter the appealing person of Jordan Peterson who has taken up their cudgel. Up to very recent times his crusade on behalf of the bourgeoisie has concentrated on social mores and public policy such as free speech, feminism, gender theory, culture, migration policies etc. But, of late, the revered professor has begun to make public his personal views on religion. He gives every appearance of being on a spiritual journey without defining his beliefs dogmatically. And it would appear that he is taking his cult following with him [and this is not to imply that he is aligned to, or starting a cult, for I could well have said his ‘fan base’]. Should these followers travel the whole journey with him and enjoy the benefit from a resultant truth which is Christian [for he is touted as being a Christian], then that ought be a good result. Peterson believes in God, in Jesus, the resurrection conditionally, and the bible for a start. Why then should I express concern?
Co-incidentally, I posted a YouTube video on facebook just yesterday of Peterson talking with Ben Shapiro and Dave Rubin and my comment displayed a concern that I had. As I put it, “He appears to be trying to re-invent the metaphysical wheel, and has not yet found his own answer to the perennial question of ‘Why Is There Not Nothing?'” I would have thought a champion of reasoned thinking might have come to some basic answer, albeit that he already is said to have faith, notwithstanding that, as I am too aware, faith and knowledge are developmental and beg to grow. I suggested too that he appeared to be much influenced by Jung and de Chardin.  As circumstance would have it, last night my reading material included articles from The Federalist, and this article was one:
I quote:
“This, combined with his rhetorical approach and that his Canadian accent affects just enough of the exotic to tantalize Americans who assume profundity in such things, is exactly the stuff of a YouTube sensation. If that makes Christianity cool again, or helps skeptical Christians feel good and intellectual about the faith, that can’t be a bad thing. I guess.
More likely, however, Peterson is fostering our cultural Gnosticism. Consider his understanding of God, what he calls his first hypothesis: God is the abstraction of a human ideal formalized over millions of years of human development in the myths and teachings of any religion. Does an actual transcendent deity exist? Peterson leaves this “floating up in the air” (his words, in lecture one), something unfit for rational investigation.”
[The article itself, and the author, begs for critique. But I will leave that for now].
The article is lengthy and I found it disturbing as Gnosticism is antithetical to Christianity. Peterson is also an evolutionist of the type that denies the Catholic Christian doctrine that God created two sentient beings who sought the “knowledge” to be as gods and their sin bastardized the perfection of all things that God had created and so required redemption to be restored as a New Earth as we find in Christ. I fear that Peterson is going the New Age road of the “proud” who ignore the tenets established over thousands of years through Tradition, Revelation and the Bible and embarking on Teilhard’s road of “knowing the essence of God” as Adam sought to do, via the Cosmic Theology of either or both the collective unconscious or collective consciousness that culminates in the “Omega Point”. He is entitled to ruminate and embark on his journey but it is of concern that he is taking many thousands down a dubious road to a belief system that leads away from the very God being sought. I do wish he would stick with social commentary and not publicize his esoteric beliefs.
The substance of Gnosticism and the theories of Jung, of whom he is a devotee, are too much for this article but I refer readers to search the personalities and beliefs mentioned, and I recommend the article link above from The Federalist. Should a reader do so then I also refer him to look at the bio of Richard Noll too. Noll was a critic of Jung’s theories and wrote a relevant book. Prof. Peterson launched an attack on Noll, claiming that the book cover had Nazi images. It did not, and Peterson later issued an apology, so our hero is very touchy about his affinity to Jung.
We can know God here and now in various ways, experientially, by Grace, from Jesus words and actions, through prayer and so on. But, the Divine essence is indeterminate for humans, and were it not then there would be no need for faith or even maybe free will. Traditionally, theology concerning the knowability of God has been to define Him by what He is not, and somewhat by what He is, and it is only pride that thinks God can be discovered through esoteric knowledge. The temptation to eat of the tree of knowledge was too much for Adam, and it is still insistent for us. My hope is that a seemingly good man finds joy and peace for his soul in the truths of Jesus, and comes to know the efficacy of God’s Grace in his life because cosmic theology and Gnosticism denies the personal Father-God who has a real and tangible love for every soul he has created. I leave readers with just one of Peterson’s videos with his esoteric theories.
Glory be to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

EVERYTHING YOU BELIEVE MAY BE WRONG

  STATEMENT TO YOU, DEAR READERS of our blog and social media pages YOUR WORLDVIEW MAY WELL HAVE BEEN INFLUENCED BY AN ELITE HEGEMONY and th...