ATTALI et al. The Jewish World State

 

====

References for articles.

Influence on Macron:  https://yuribarzov.medium.com/beloved-student-4ab710d544fd

Attali new age https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281896844_A_review_of_Devenir_Soi_by_Jacques_Attali_Through_the_lenses_of_liberalism_and_Buddhism See my file download.

Attali suggests Israel as world HQ https://modernfathers1867.wordpress.com/2020/11/19/the-pandemic-that-is-beginning-could-trigger-one-of-those-structuring-fears-conversation-with-jacques-attali-change-as-a-precaution-3-5-2009/

Further links to Attali https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ALeKk01K-QLTITS4ULw9SQxs1qneiuxaMw:1618831392242&source=univ&tbm=isch&q=conversations+with+jacques+attali&client=opera&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjBttfwmIrwAhUFwjgGHac8Cj8Q7Al6BAgMEAQ&biw=1326&bih=665 

And... https://www.google.com/search?q=jacques+attali+freemason+biderberg&client=opera&hs=c

The Level Club http://thelodgeroom.blogspot.com/2014/11/jaques-attali-addresses-freemasons-in.html

INFLUENTIAL J's

 

===

Displayed on this page are links to our “InfoTables” – neatly packaged single-image table charts displaying significant Jewish people from important categories. They are designed for easy sharing and distribution.

More will be added over time.

“Out of the Top 25 Hedge Fund Managers (according to Forbes), 18 are Jewish.” (2020)

“All of President Joe Biden’s Children are married to Jews.”

“The lawyers leading both sides of the trials determining Donald Trump’s second impeachment are Jewish.”

“The modern adult film industry was pioneered by Jewish trailblazers.”

“American feminism, especially “second wave feminism”, was largely influenced and led by Jewish women.”

“Many of President Joe Biden’s cabinet picks, especially high-level ones, are Jewish.”

“Out of the top 25 donors to the 2020 US general election, 15 were Jewish.”

“Out Of The 8 Ivy League Universities, 7 Have Jewish Presidents.”

“Within the 5 decades from 1970 to 2020, Jews headed the Federal Reserve for over 38 years.”

source: https://jewishcontributions.com/infotables/ 

Prominent in the porn industry: https://forward.com/schmooze/310041/7-jews-who-made-it-big-in- porn/

DEEP STATE IS RUNNING THE COVID TASK FORCE: Part 1.

The Pence appointed Dr. Fauci, along with his sidekick, Dr. Birx, are supposedly heading the fight to mitigate the virus, SARS-Cov2, which results in the illness known as Covid-19 and declared to be a pandemic which in turn has prompted governments to severely restrict the movements of citizens to the extent of denying natural rights. By now, this is all well known.

What is not well known is that Fauci and Birx have intimate ties, personal and financial, to the big players in the Pharma Deep State, to wit: Bill Gates, George Soros, and other individuals as well as W.H.O., ID2020, WEF, PREPFAR, and various other organisations, along with vaccine and drug companies, especially Burroughs Wellcome. I can add to these the U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops and the Catholic Relief Service [which I will deal with in Part 2].

WHY HAVE I CLAIMED THAT THEY "SUPPOSEDLY LEAD THE FIGHT TO MITIGATE THE EFFECTS OF COVID-19"?  I have said this based on their modus operandi thus far, which has been [1] to promulgate overblown modeling of the infected and the likely death rate to add a panic and fear element to gain the subservience of the population to their instructions, and [2] to attribute deaths to Covid-19 which may be due to other causes.

AND WHY WOULD THEY DO THIS? In short: to gain time to bring a vaccine or drug on the market from which they can profit. Hence, this is the reason that Dr. Fauci in particular, along with others with a vested interest, have downplayed the efficacy of the anti-malarial drug, Chloroquine, [as well as other drugs mainly associated with HIV mitigation], which in some jurisdictions has been banned or has had approval delayed. For the sake of brevity I will omit the many links available to support this claim. Links are readily available showing Bill Gates advocating for the world population to be vaccinated - along with the inclusion of a nano-chip which certifies said vaccination. Along with this plea, Gates has said he does not want to see a lot of survivors with immunity !! [Refer the TED talks]. I will here give away the Gotcha Moment very early by telling you that, thanks to the research of "Amazing Polly", there is a Ms. Birx [unknown yet if she is related], who works directly for the Gates Foundation, a daughter is connected to Rep, Feinstein whose chauffeur of 20 years was known to be a Chinese CCP spy.

Below is pictured from 1990 a protest against Fauci by the gay community. The reason for this protest was that Fauci was heading the fight against AIDS and was not considered to be doing enough to employ a mitigating medication to stop deaths from the epidemic of HIV.

WHAT HAPPENED LATER?

Fauci pressured the government and FDA to rush through a medication for widespread use before trials were completed known as AZT. The drug AZT was a toxin used unsuccessfully for cancer 20 years earlier. It was totally unnecessary according to some virologists as shown in the video below by Prof. E.Michael Jones who claims additionally that Fauci's actions were responsible for many deaths. Further, he claims that Fauci was desperate to appease the homosexual community by displaying that the heterosexual were also susceptible to AIDS to obviate the stigma attached to gays and their lifestyle. Prof. Jones now makes the analogy with COVID-19 in that Fauci is indulging in scientism over reason in his tactics to design the circumstances of the need to lockdown society until the vaccine is ready. BUT, dear reader, I have only just noted references suggesting that there are moves to stop resisting the approval of Chloroquinine as there are moves to COMBINE IT WITH AZT as a proprietary medication !! [I will have to add references to this at a later date]. News is coming out daily that vaccine trials are progressing quickly anyway, so more will be added on that subject later.

FURTHER REFERENCE: https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2020/04/05/is-what-were-being-told-about-the-coronavirus-pandemic-wrong-n2566373 

.                                              **********************************

NOW, BACK TO THE [1] Modeling false paradigm, and [2] The attribution of uncertain causes of deaths to COVID-19.


These snaps ought to be enough to cast doubt and suspicion on how deaths are being recorded so I will let them speak for themselves.

I haven't heard Dr. Birx reiterate the above instructions but this tweeter does as follows....

Brit Hume

✔@brithume

Well, Dr. Birx just said it. Anyone in U.S. who dies with Covid 19, regardless of what else may be wrong, is now being recorded as a Covid 19 death.

44.7K

7:24 AM - Apr 8, 2020

.                                                   *********************************


NOW FOR POINT [2] Modeling. 

There are a multitude of references made by qualified people. I will take the view of Dr. Wm.Briggs. SOURCE: https://wmbriggs.com/post/30236/  

Yesterday I showed the deaths/cases plot. I speculated the “plot is still rocketing northwards means (1) cases are under-reported (lack of measurement), (2) deaths over-attributed (dying with is not same as dying from), or (3) both.” (1) is surely happening, but Hume’s tweet is proof (2) is, too.

Adjusting numbers is one good way to boost numbers to get them to align closer to forecasts.

Blaze has a list (thanks to David Legates for this) of model predictions.

Summary (all are quotes):

• Think Global: Total U.S. deaths: 1.64 million. Social distancing taken into account? No.
• CDC: Total U.S. deaths: 200,000 to 1.7 million. Social distancing taken into account? No.
• Imperial College of London: Total U.S. deaths: 2.2 million. Social distancing taken into account? … might reduce peak healthcare demand by 2/3 and deaths by half.
• University of Massachusetts – Amherst: Total U.S. deaths: 195,000 by the end of the year. Social distancing taken into account? …had the option to account for measures in their answers.
• The Coronavirus Task Force Model: Total U.S. deaths: 100,000 to 240,000. Social distancing taken into account? Yes
• Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation: Total U.S. deaths: 81,766. Social Distancing taken into account? Yes, model assumes full social distancing through May. [MAY!]

BMJ has one of the first papers on the subject: Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal, by Wynants et al.

…27 studies describing 31 prediction models were included…

This review indicates that proposed models are poorly reported, at high risk of bias, and their reported performance is probably optimistic. Immediate sharing of well documented individual participant data from covid-19 studies is needed for collaborative efforts to develop more rigorous prediction models and validate existing ones…Methodological guidance should be followed because unreliable predictions could cause more harm than benefit in guiding clinical decisions.

This is harsh considering we’re not even at the end, yet.

The AP has an article by the usual suspects expressing wonder scientific models can be wrong: Modeling coronavirus: Uncertainty is the only certainty’.

The only problem with this bit of relatively good news? It’s almost certainly wrong. All models are wrong. Some are just less wrong than others — and those are the ones that public health officials rely on.

Welcome to the grimace-and-bear-it world of modeling.

STRATEGY OF THE LEFT

The Left’s Strategy and Tactics To Transform America

April 29, 2019Deep State, Domestic Threat, Report, Rich Higgins, Stephen Coughlin, The Left, Threat Doctrine

NEW REPORT: Re-Remembering the Mis-Remembered Left: The Left’s Strategy and Tactics To Transform America©

By Stephen Coughlin and Richard Higgins
February 2019
UPDATED: July 2019

Download PDF Report Buy Print Version
Report is 8.5″x11″, 253 pages in full-color

“The same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe—the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God.” — John F. Kennedy, Inaugural Address,” January 20, 1961

~

“We think too small, like the frog at the bottom of the well. He thinks the sky is only as big as the top of the well. If he surfaced, he would have an entirely different view.” — Mao Zedong

~

“The abuse of political power is fundamentally connected with the sophistic abuse of the word, indeed, finds in it the fertile soil in which to hide and grow and get ready, so much so that the latent potential of the totalitarian poison can be ascertained, as it were, by observing the symptom of public abuse of language. The degradation, too, of man through man, alarmingly evident in the acts of physical violence committed by all tyrannies, has its beginning, certainly much less alarmingly, at that almost imperceptible moment when the word loses its dignity.” —Josef Pieper, Abuse of Language – Abuse of Power, 1974

~

“The American people have got to stop fooling around with just fighting communism in the abstract. They have got to know what the thing means, why they are against it, and how to fight it.” —Bella Dodd, Testimony to the HCUA, 1953

~

“And it ought to be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things. Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new.” —Machiavelli, The Prince, 1552

Executive Summary

When associated with rising factional discord, the increased hostility from the Left resonates a violence that is becoming a clear and present danger.
This paper will provide an estimate of the current situation that transcends well-travelled two-party political narratives. The objective is to provide a strategic understanding of the Left that baselines the current situation to enable directionality, predictability, and actionability. To that end, the estimate will use a political warfare analysis to reframe the political environment in order to provide timely anticipatory situational awareness in support of decision-making.
National policy has come under the influence of constructed narratives that mainstream and conservative leaders neither understand nor control. Lacking situational awareness to recognize the operational nature of information campaigns directed against national policy, responses tend to be tactically limited and predictably reactive along scripted action-reaction cycles built into the operational sequencing of information campaigns controlled by the Left. These powerful but misunderstood narratives drive policy.
At their core, these narratives are not American. Rather, they are dialectically driven Neo-Marxist memes that infuse mass line efforts operating at the cultural level intent on powering down into the political space.
This furthers the Left’s political warfare effort to impose conformance resulting in the non-enforcement of laws by those tasked with their oversight and enforcement. As these narratives transition into prevailing cultural memes, non-enforcement becomes institutionalized and enforced by an opposition that increasingly comes under the control of those narratives.
As such, for the Left, political organizations like Congress become vehicles to execute lines of effort in an execution matrix along which information campaigns are executed from outside and above.

Key Findings & Observations:

• The political rhetoric driving American politics runs along well-trodden paths sustaining a political framework from a by-gone era incapable of coming to terms with the political movements threatening our constitutional system today.

• Constrained by this archaic rhetoric, mainstream and conservative players are outmaneuvered in an information battle-space they hardly perceive; responding to current threats in under-inclusive manners.

• The “otherism” strategy developed by Marxists to destroy America focuses on the systematic destruction of identity leading to the systematic disenfranchisement of Americans from America. It manipulates the issues of the “other”, yet it has nothing to do with the “other”. Rather, it forces a classic dialectical negation along Hegelian lines. This activity presents a clear and present danger that will succeed if not countered. As such, this analysis does not suggest that this is a way to understand the left, it argues that it is the only way to understand it; recognizing that it is 1) Marxist, and 2) dialectically driven.

• The dominant cultural narratives of our time can best be summarized by the saying; “Political correctness is the enforcement mechanism of the multicultural narrative that implements Neo-Marxist objectives.” It is through these narratives that the left drives policy.

• Narratives that conservative leaders neither control nor understand drive national policy. When Republican leaders shrink from Constitutional principles for fear of being accused of racism, sexism, homophobia, etc., they are subordinating those principles to neo-Marxist narratives designed for that purpose. Though these narratives may have been initially imposed, Republicans will adopt them over time through usage. Subjective awareness of the role one plays in such a process is neither necessary nor require.
  • By submitting to these narratives, establishment Republicans first become pliant, and then obedient to the Left, accommodating it through “words that work” that create the illusion of opposition while actually signaling surrender in the information battle space. In that role, regardless of the mandates that got them elected, establishment Republicans will defend the issues that got them elected in deliberately under-inclusive manners that conditions those issues for dialectical negation while demoralizing their base. What Republicans demoralize, the Left then disenfranchises. In this role, establishment Republicans become the defeat mechanism of the Left. (“Defeat Mechanism: The method of defeating the opponent.”  Joint Publication 5-00.1, Joint Doctrine for Campaign Planning, January 25, 2002).

• 
  

• A strategic understanding of the Left recognizes that it is dialectically driven. As such, the Left is a teleologically informed movement that executes through history and thought, along an arc, with a trajectory. It is Hegelian. It defines everything that “is” as fuel for “becoming” in a dialectical process that compels it to negate. — “Change” “Perpetual Revolution” — Analysis of the Left that does not account for the dialectic will fail.

• The critical theory of the Frankfurt School is classical Marxism dedicated to penetration and subversion that relies on Hegelian processes to achieve its objectives:
  • It seeks the destruction of Western culture;
  • It is focused on an “aufheben der Kultur” strategy based on “otherisms” (and is nothing more than the targeted application of the dialectical principle of negation to a people)
  • It is fully integrated into larger political warfare efforts

• Frankfurt School leader Herbert Marcuse concurred with the Gramsci Marxist plan to adopt a “long march through the institutions” strategy based on Mao’s “long march” political warfare strategy.

• Political Warfare is a Maoist Insurgency concept that recognizes the role narratives play in overwhelming rule of law societies. It includes the formation of mass line movements and counter-state activities. It also uses cultural level narratives to power down into the political space where fidelity to the narrative will result in non-enforcement of law that, over time, becomes institutionalized.

• In Mass Line strategies, political engagements meet the people where they are. Through gentle nudges over time, passive participants become active. At first, a target may only be asked to sign a petition or provide an email or mailing address. From that point, the subject becomes the recipient of sustained communications related to the issues of the originating petition. While an individual may not be politically active, that person—through the supporting consumption of mass market media—will become more susceptible to activist messaging and discontent. The overarching goal of this line of effort is the development and reinforcement of a mass line as it builds the counter-state within the state; complete with its own bundle of replacement legal, cultural, and social norms that operate in parallel with that of the host culture’s.

• The reason America’s current toolbox of responses is perilous is because it accepts mass line concepts of America as the terms of engagement. When, for example, mainstream Americans are manipulated into responding to mass line narratives from within those narratives, a (dialectical) paradox sets in where the highly ideological thrust of the Left’s ambitions are made to sound normal while mainstream defenses of America sound shrill, rigid, and even ideological.

• The Left focuses on cultural and institutional power by communicating its ideological initiatives in terms of “values” while targeting the placement of cadre throughout the mass line so they can enable those “values” by converting them first to norms, then to policy, and finally to law.

• What is popularly called “fake news” and the “deep-state” are better understood as propaganda and the counter-state. Transitioning to a political warfare analysis, one begins to discern methods, processes and directionality that terms like “fake news” and “deep-state” do not capture. By their nature, media terms like “fake news” and “deep-state” ensure that analysis remains fixed on the surface of events.

• Our national aversion to recognizing threats beyond the strictly military, especially ideological threats in the political warfare arena, has long been recognized by America’s foes as an exploitable strategic level vulnerability.

• The Left uses dialectically determined political warfare concepts to drive a core set of narratives that inter-operate at the tactical level while integrating at the strategic. Narratives are associated with the pseudorealities (or second realities) they seek to establish and enforce. They are called narratives because they are stories—fictions—that seek to supplant the real with the unreal. These narratives are directional, they have velocity, and are always oriented on a target.

Saying that “the Left moves dialectically, through time, on a trajectory” simply recognizes that the Left is a movement in history defined by its movement through history; that its backward trajectory defines its forward movement; and that failure to recognize this arc leads to error. It is for this reason that this assessment emphasizes historical events, conditions and movements that have defined the Left from the Hegelian dialectic, to Marx, to Wilson’s progressivism, to the early Frankfurt School, to Mao’s Long March, to Marcuse’s thoughts on tolerance, to political correctness.
This is how the Left should be understood. Hence, it would be a mistake to treat the historical elements of this assessment as little more than background material. Assessing the Left as if Hegel and Marx simply provide interesting historical context to today’s events is the failure to recognize that for the Left, Marx was yesterday and Hegel the day before. Between the two, they are the source code of today’s Left. To emphasize this point, a recent Daily Caller article is included as Appendix E to demonstrate just how relevant historical awareness of the Left is to understanding today’s Left.
Download PDF Report Buy Print Version

THE JONES AFFAIR IS OUR AFFAIR

ALAN JONES, Aussie radio host, has been called a misogynist for suggesting the PM tell Jacinda Ardern, the PM of NZ, to "Put a Sock In It", or words to that effect. His critics are waging a war to have him deplatformed and are running a campaign with the stations advertisers to drop him. This is not about Jones or his character, this is about us; about our cultural expressions, our axioms, and our customs.

The attacks emanate from the usual suspects of the left, the cultural Marxists. As globalists, their general aims are to wreck our uniqueness of expression and customs to homogenize the population under the false and contradictory principle of multiculturalism which, in fact, destroys difference and diversity. We must be converted into a single, controlled mass of tolerant relativists who can be criminalized for offending the perpetually offended virtue-signalers and snowflakes of minorities and intersectionals so that their waving of the hammer and sickle is not objected to. They need to be freed up to hyper-sexualize our children, convince them that they were born in the wrong body, and develop their army of non-procreating homosexuals to reduce the population and rid the country of conservative Christians who stand in their way with their abominable, restrictive moralities and imaginary friend in the sky.
  A reckoning is coming.

An Aussie can run into the PM in the street and feel free to say: "G'day Scott, how about you pull your finger out with the coal mines, mate?" without being hauled off to the clink. No undue offense is intended and none would be taken. Were the PM a female, it would not be considered a misogynistic remark, unless you went by the name of Tony Abbott and glanced at your watch while she was speaking. Nor would it imply that his finger was in any particular location, literally. It's our way, our casualness, our egalitarianism. At least it has been for a few hundred years. Similarly, 'putting a sock in it' is a euphamism, it's metaphoric, but to the leftist flakes it's literal. They deliberately interpret such cheeky banalities either because they are ignorant products of a dumbed down educational process or else they weaponize their misinterpretation to stifle our axioms and to change our unique customs. It's their weapon of war against our ways.

This activism is being driven by Melbourne's soy boy Green Pollie, Adam the Bandt, and the page titled "F***ING MAD WITCHES" with their supposed 50,000 followers who have hounded the advertisers to desert the radio program. Many of them have complied in the way that only corporations with a political agenda can. These pretenders of femininity must be so self-loathing about their abilities to attract a male complement and compliment, that they adopt the persona of the Sistahood Of Aleister Crowley interbred with oily dregs of waste to spew their vitriol in vile language against mere euphamisms and metaphors. They are nothing but dykey SJW's devoid of morality and principle, judging by their postings. Such under-achievers are sour that they are not noticed and their narcissism is fulfilled in playing the "Bad Bitches" of the anti-hero genre to appear cooool, just ever so cool. "Look at moi, look at moi!" We have. You're ugly, very ugly, and your agenda is patent. Bugger orf, shove a sock in it, and go read some C.J.Dennis.

BORIS JOHNSON

FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Boris Johnson and the EU: Crash through or just crash

by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, July 27, 2019

Boris Johnson, elected overwhelmingly by the grass roots of the British Conservative Party to replace Theresa May as Prime Minister, faces the awesome task of reuniting the British Government to secure Britain’s exit from the European Union, within just three months.

Boris Johnson: Never lost for words.

Boris Johnson is an unlikely Prime Minister. The 55-year-old former mayor of London cuts a bedraggled figure, with a mop of characteristically uncombed blond hair, clothes askew, and a penchant for putting his foot in his mouth while quoting Latin aphorisms that nobody understands.

Yet he has pursued the prime ministership with singular determination.

Theresa May stepped down as leader of the party after she failed three times to win parliamentary support for her agreement with the European Union on the terms of British withdrawal.

Boris Johnson, though a member of the Conservative Government, led the campaign to withdraw from the EU in 2016, then scuttled May’s proposal, describing it as a betrayal of the British people’s vote to leave the union.

Johnson and a group of Tory rebels was supported by the British Labour Party in voting down May’s agreement.

Difficult task

Johnson now faces the task of uniting a fractured party around a new proposal to withdraw from the EU, or leave the EU without a deal in three months time.

His election poses problems for both sides of politics. Johnson is supported by a clear majority of Tory MPs. But, if pro-EU Tories vote against him in Parliament alongside the Labour Party, at the very least they may expedite Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union without a deal – the one outcome they have totally rejected.

If the Labour Party is successful in moving a vote of “no confidence” in Parliament against Johnson, it may bring on an early election, which opinion polls say Labour would decisively lose. In any case, it is a high-risk strategy. It may be that Boris Johnson is anticipating such a move as a means of weakening or even splitting the Labour Party.

The British Labour Party campaigned assiduously against May, and demanded that she call an early election, and Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has repeated calls for Johnson to go to an early poll.

But Corbyn has not proposed a vote of “no confidence” against the British Prime Minister, which is the only practical way to bring on an early election, under existing law. In any case, the British Parliament has just gone into the summer recess, and nothing will happen for at least another month.

It remains to be seen whether Boris Johnson’s aggressive anti-EU rhetoric forces the EU to take a more accommodating approach than it did with May.

EU business leaders have long warned of the calamitous consequences for Europe if Britain unilaterally withdraws from the union. They have pointed to the vast imbalance in trade that is currently in favour of the EU, to the damage to joint projects such as Airbus, key parts of which are manufactured in Britain, and to the future status of EU citizens living in the UK.

The UK has a population of about 64 million, of which 2.9 million (5 per cent) are from Europe. They would all require visas to remain in the UK after Brexit, and may not be permitted to stay and work in the UK. Over a million Brits live permanently in other parts of the EU.

Whatever the adverse consequences for Britain of crashing out of the EU without a deal, the consequences for Europe will arguably be even worse.

Belatedly, the leaders of the EU seem to have accepted that. Recent elections in the EU have increased the strength of anti-EU parties across Europe, adding to tensions within the union, and increasing the possibility that other countries may hold referenda on withdrawal.

For most countries in Europe, withdrawal would be considerably more difficult than Britain’s, not just because of the common borders, but also because – unlike Britain, which retained its own currency, the pound sterling – they have adopted the common currency, the euro.

In the meantime, Boris Johnson has moved quickly to appoint a new cabinet that is strongly pro-Brexit. Over half the members of May’s team have been replaced, including the top five jobs.

Apart from Boris Johnson as Prime Minister, they include:

• Chancellor of the Exchequer (equivalent of our Treasurer) Sajid Javid, the former Home Secretary, bank executive and son of Pakistani Muslim immigrants.
• Home Secretary Priti Patel, born in London of Indian refugees from Uganda.
• Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab, son of a Jewish Czech immigrant, who had resigned last November over May’s Brexit deal.
• Defence Secretary Ben Wallace, a former commander in the Scots Guard and supporter of a no-deal Brexit.

There is a strong sense that the European Union’s intransigence in negotiations with Theresa May has now given them Boris Johnson, a far more difficult leader to deal with. And Johnson has made clear that compromise is not a word in his expansive vocabulary.