POPE "SAINT" JOHN PAUL II and "SAINT" FAUSTINA ........ QUESTION MARKS.

A friend whom I shall call Mary has asked for my thoughts on two "saints" of the Catholic Church in connection with the devotion known as Divine Mercy which came through supposed appearances of Our Blessed Lord to the Polish nun, Sr. Faustina, who is of the same nationality as Pope John Paul II.
I have chosen to answer in this blog as it would be too lengthy for the platform we were using to correspond.

For the unfamiliar, the writings of Faustina detailing the appearances of Jesus to her [circa 1930"s], were placed on the Index Of Forbidden Books by Pope Pius XII as dangerous to the faith. Even Pope John XXIII forbade images of Divine Mercy to be displayed in churches. Following a petition from Polish bishops, including the future John Paul II, Karol Vojtyla, to reconsider the revelations, writings and devotional of Divine Mercy, these were approved after the Vatican II Council.


Source: https://books.google.com.au/books?id=gq2KCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA179&lpg=PA179&dq=who+approved+writings+of+sr+faustina&source=bl&ots=tCK3et29GI&sig=ACfU3U1NBxiCl0RBGjL-rUAW6vcoQb9elQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwimzq66_rfpAhU3yzgGHbrYCIkQ6AEwEXoECA0QAQ#v=onepage&q=who%20approved%20writings%20of%20sr%20faustina&f=false

Personal Note: The devotional didn't appear to become popular in Australia for sometime. Indeed I had never come across it in the few parishes I had lived in until 2009 where my newest parish had the icon prominently displayed and after the first mass that I attended the devotional prayers were recited. Not only did I find the icon with its laser beams off-putting but I was shocked that rosary beads were used in the prayers. It was as if the rosary was being replaced.

Faustina's revelations and writings were not something that I intended to spend time on, but as time went by I did do a some research. I was motivated then because this cult was associated with other matters I was looking into, viz.: the heresies of Vatican II and the dubious encyclicals and behavior of John Paul II [not to mention other persons of high office].

It is best at this point if I set down some of Sr. Faustina's own words and let the reader judge for themselves. For me, I find these and other passages quite antithetical to Catholic beliefs and contradictory to accepted theology.

On page 23 of the book Divine Mercy in My Soul (The Diary of Sr. Faustina), it says: “… and the host came out of the tabernacle and came to rest in my hands and I, with joy, placed it back in the tabernacle. This was repeated a second time, and I did the same thing. Despite this, it happened a third time…”1
On page 89 of the book Divine Mercy in My Soul, it says: “When the priest approached me again, I raised the host for him to put back into the chalice, because when I had first received Jesus I could not speak before consuming the host, and so could not tell Him that the other host had fallen. But while I was holding the host in my hand, I felt such a power of love that for the rest of the day I could neither eat nor come to my senses. I heard these words from the host: I desired to rest in your hands, not only in your heart.”2
On page 168, it says: “The moment I knelt down to cross out my own will, as the Lord had bid me to do, I heard this voice in my soul: From now on, do not fear God’s judgment, for you will not be judged.”3 (From Feb. 4, 1935)
On page 176, “Jesus” says to her: “You are a sweet grape and a chosen cluster; I want others to have a share in the juice that is flowing within you.”4
On page 191, “Jesus” says to her: “For your sake I will withhold the hand which punishes; for your sake I will bless the Earth.”5 (Also see page 378.)
On page 247, “Jesus” says: “And know this, too, My daughter: All creatures, whether they know it or not, and whether they want to or not, always fulfill my will… My daughter, if you wish, I will this instant create a new world, more beautiful than this one, and you will live there for the rest of your life.”6
On page 260, “Jesus” says: “For many souls will turn back from the gates of Hell and worship My mercy.”7
On page 374, “Jesus” says: “If they will not adore My mercy, they will perish for all eternity.”8 On page 382, “Jesus” says: “I desire that My mercy be worshipped.”9
On page 288, “Jesus” says: “That is why I am uniting myself with you so intimately as with no other creature.”10
On page 400, “Jesus” says: “I see your love so pure, purer than that of the angels, and all the more so because you keep fighting. For your sake I bless the world.”11
On page 417, we read that “Jesus” supposedly gave Sr. Faustina this instruction: “Tell the Superior General to count on you as the most faithful daughter in the Order.”12
On page 583, we read that Sr. Faustina said: “When I took the Messenger of the Sacred Heart into my hand and read the account of the canonization of St. Andrew Bobola, my soul was instantly filled with a great longing that our congregation, too, might have a saint and I wept like a child that there was no saint in our midst. And I said to the Lord, ‘I know your generosity, and yet it seems to me that you are less generous towards us.’ And I began again to weep like a little child. And the Lord Jesus said to me, ‘Don’t cry. You are that saint.’”13
Source: https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/41_Dmercy.pdf

Now we come to John Paul II. At one point I considered him a true man of God, holding much admiration for him. I served at his mass in 1984 along with many other acolytes. Subsequently, however, I had occasion to look into his life and was stunned to find that he had, only a month previously, been the architect of the infamous Assisi interfaith celebrations. I wonder today about the motivation for his canonization so soon after his death [ and throw John XXIII into that bucket too].



Part of my readings on him were his first encyclical. I found it in tune with, and as heretical as, Nostra Aetate, a document of Vatican II which was so appeasing and accepting of contrary beliefs held by pagans and Jews. In the following you may note how his words accord with Francis' attitude to relativism and to paganistic tenets.

John Paul II, Redemptor Hominis (# 13), March 4, 1979: “We are dealing with each man, for each one is included in the mystery of the Redemption and with each one Christ has united Himself forever through this mystery.”3 ystery of ion and with each one Christ has united himself forever

John Paul II, Redemptoris Missio (# 4), Dec. 7, 1990: “The Redemption event brings salvation to all, ‘for each one is included in the m the Redempt through this mystery.’”4

John Paul II, Redemptor Hominis (# 6), March 4, 1979: “Does it not sometimes happen that the firm belief of the followers of the non-Christian religions – a belief that is also an effect of the Spirit of truth operating outside the visible confines of the Mystical Body…”10





In contrast, on just this particular matter, here is the standard teaching of the Church ......

Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 2), Jan. 6, 1928: “For which reason conventions, meetings and addresses are frequently arranged by these persons, at which a large number of listeners are present, and at which all without distinction are invited to join in the discussion, both infidels of every kind, and Christians, even those who have unhappily fallen away from Christ or who with obstinacy and pertinacity deny His divine nature and mission. Certainly such attempts can nowise be approved by Catholics, founded as they are on that false opinion which considers all religions to be more or less good and praiseworthy, since they all in different ways manifest and signify that sense which is inborn in us all, and by which we are led to the obedient acknowledgment of His rule. Not only are those who hold this opinion in error and deceived, but also in distorting the idea of true religion they reject it, and little by little, turn aside to naturalism and atheism, as it is called; from which it clearly follows that one who supports those who hold these theories and attempt to realize them, is altogether abandoning the divinely revealed religion.”

 Pope Pius VIII, May 24, 1829: “Against these experienced sophists the people must be taught that the profession of the Catholic faith is uniquely true, as the apostle proclaims: one Lord, one faith, one baptism.”

For a full treatment of the heresies of John Paul, see ......
https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/16_JohnPaulII.pdf

Finally, what originally motivated me to even look into this man's words and actions?  The answer is that I had been researching one of the most evil presbyters I had come across - Fr. Marcel Marciel. While that is another story, that lead to the man - the pope JPII - who refused to act against Marcel. Along with this matter, I was no less impressed later, when I had cause to write about the new age movement along with Gnosticism. That topic revealed the role of Fr. Teilhard de Chardin in spiritual heresy and who had been reprimanded by the Vatican and became some what outcast - that was until he was welcomed back, with adulation, largely thanks to JPII. 

Into the future, perhaps Faustina will be put on a level with the mystics. Maybe that would be more fitting. I don't know.
I don't know either how JPII will be viewed in the next century. I know, as many do, of his work to overcome Communism. Regarding "sainthood" - Catholics are not required to believe just as they are not required to believe in private revelations or even public revelations.
Their status makes no difference to me Mary, but those are some things I have learnt along the way.

in JMJ.




----

THE PRIVACY INVASIONS OF THE COVID PROTOCOLS

..

TUESDAY, MAY 12, 2020

HR 6666 - Covid Is New World Order Excuse To Control Us Via Tracing

I will preface this with some warnings, the reasons for which will be clear in the presentation.

• Do NOT submit to "testing" unless obviously sick with symptoms.
• Do NOT allow any "tracers" into your home.
• Do NOT download any tracing apps to your phones.

Now I present the video, with important information following.

The bill to which Weston refers is HR 6666.  Here it is, as posted on Congress' web site.  Below is the text of that bill.  My colleague at Les Femmes posted it too, with pertinent points highlighted, so I'll just borrow her text.

Obviously what should be added to the list above is to tell your representative that you oppose this bill and they should also vote to oppose it.  We should all also contact the House Energy and Commerce Committee for that is where its initial hearings are being conducted.

H.R 6666 

116th CONGRESS

2d Session

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, and related activities such as contact tracing, through mobile health units and, as necessary, at individuals’ residences, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 1, 2020

Mr. Rush (for himself, Ms. Barragán, Ms. Bass, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Brown of Maryland, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Cárdenas, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Correa, Mr. Cuellar, Ms. DeGette, Mrs. Demings, Mr. Gonzalez of Texas, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Hastings, Mrs. Hayes, Mr. Higgins of New York, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Khanna, Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Lynch, Ms. McCollum, Ms. Moore, Ms. Norton, Mr. Payne, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Rouda, Mr. Ryan, Mr. Sarbanes, Ms. Sewell of Alabama, Mr. Sires, Mr. Soto, Ms. Tlaib, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Van Drew, Ms. Velázquez, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, and Mrs. Napolitano) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, and related activities such as contact tracing, through mobile health units and, as necessary, at individuals’ residences, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “COVID–19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act”.

SEC. 2. COVID–19 TESTING AND CONTACT TRACING USING MOBILE HEALTH UNITS.

(a) In General.—The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, may award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, to trace and monitor the contacts of infected individuals, and to support the quarantine of such contacts, through—

(1) mobile health units; and 

(2) as necessary, testing individuals and providing individuals with services related to testing and quarantine at their residences.

(b) Permissible Uses Of Funds.—A grant recipient under this section may use the grant funds, in support of the activities described in subsection 

(a)— 

(1) to hire, train, compensate, and pay the expenses of individuals; and

(2) to purchase personal protective equipment and other supplies.

(c) Priority.—In selecting grant recipients under this section, the Secretary shall give priority to—

(1) applicants proposing to conduct activities funded under this section in hot spots and medically underserved communities; and

(2) applicants that agree, in hiring individuals to carry out activities funded under this section, to hire residents of the area or community where the activities will primarily occur, with higher priority among applicants described in this paragraph given based on the percentage of individuals to be hired from such area or community.

(d) Distribution.—In selecting grant recipients under this section, the Secretary shall ensure that grants are distributed across urban and rural areas.

(e) Federal Privacy Requirements.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede any Federal privacy or confidentiality requirement, including the regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–191; 110 Stat. 2033) and section 543 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290dd–2).

(f) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) The term “eligible entity” means— 

(A) a Federally qualified health center (as defined in section 1861(aa) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(aa)));

(B) a school-based health clinic;

(C) a disproportionate share hospital (as defined under the applicable State plan under title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.) pursuant to section 1923(a)(1)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–4));

(D) an academic medical center;

(E) a nonprofit organization (including any such faith-based organization);

(F) an institution of higher education (as defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001));

(G) a high school (as defined in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801)); or

(H) any other type of entity that is determined by the Secretary to be an eligible entity for purposes of this section.

(2) The term “emergency period” has the meaning given to that term in section 1135(g)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–5(g)(1)(B)). 

(3) The term “hot spot” means a geographic area where the rate of infection with the virus that causes COVID–19 exceeds the national average. 

(4) The term “medically underserved community” has the meaning given to that term in section 799B of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295p). 

(5) The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

(g) Authorization Of Appropriations.—To carry out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated—

(1) $100,000,000,000 for fiscal year 2020; and

(2) such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal year 2021 and any subsequent fiscal year during which the emergency period continues

SOURCE:  https://restore-dc-catholicism.blogspot.com/2020/05/hr-6666-covid-is-new-world-order-excuse.html

...

GATES-OF-HELL ?

.

April 27, 2020

BILL GATES AND THE "LUCIFER TRUST."
IS THERE A CONNECTION?

Last week I wrote about Bill Gates’s connection to eugenics, Nazis, and white supremacy. Bill credits his father as the spiritual leader of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. His father was “head of Planned Parenthood,” according to Bill, Jr, an organization whose founder, Margaret Sanger, called for using birth control and sterilization to eliminate “human waste” and “create a race of thoroughbreds.”

In her Birth Control Review she published Ernst Rudin, a close friend who was then serving as Hitler’s Director of Genetic Sterilization for the Nazis. As one contributor to Sanger’s Birth Control Review wrote: “It is the lower elements of the population, the negroid aboriginal tribes and the pariahs or outcasts, who are gaining the fastest.”  [1]

Bill Gates (right center) next to eugenicist Jeffrey Epstein (left center) from New York Times article, “Bill Gates met with Jeffrey Epstein many times, despite his past.” (Oct. 12, 2019). See also “Jeffrey Epstein Hoped to Seed Human Race With His DNA.” (NYTimes, July 31, 2019) and “Private jets, parties and eugenics: Jeffrey Epstein's bizarre world of scientists,” (The Guardian, August 8, 2019).

Bill Gates champions the “magic of vaccines” and calls vaccines “something I love.” In my recent book, I document the Gates Foundation’s targeted efforts to depopulate Ethiopia and Africa. The book also verifies accusations by Kenya’s Catholic doctors association, the nation’s largest, of 3 million women there unknowingly receiving vaccinations from the Gates-funded World Health Organization that were secretly laced with a sterilant and contraceptive. The WHO denied it, but in 2017, the former prime minister of Kenya, Raila Odinga backed the doctors: “Today, we can confirm to the country that the Catholic Church was right.” [2]

Dr. Wahome Ngare was the lead doctor and chief whistleblower exposing the corrupt vaccines laced with sterilant injected into over 3 million unsuspecting Kenyan women. Doctor Ngare believes in vaccines, has administered them for decades, and vaccinates his own children.

Do I think Bill and Melinda are conspiring in back rooms to depopulate only darker races? I doubt it. (Well, Bill maybe.) Somebody is probably doing that, but my guess is that Bill and Melinda are admirable proponents of an ideology that believes they are helping the world. And when they run into facts that challenge their ideology, they do what many of us do at times. They block it out. 

But somebody out there is cooking up evil. And how does one catch them? In my quest ten years ago to dig up more on Gates, I learned that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a donor to the Lucis Trust (formerly the “Lucifer Trust” by some accounts—we will pursue that in a moment). Lucis Trust is headquartered at 866 United Nations Plaza and claims 6,000 members. The Lucis Trust website showed the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as a Financial Partner with a Lucis Trust subsidiary, the New Group of World Servers. The Lucis website says “Men of goodwill who co-operate form part of the New Group of World Servers which is working to implement the Plan.” 

Purchase books by Dean W. Arnold at Amazon.

What is “the Plan”? They don’t say specifically but “ultimate world unity” is mentioned in the same paragraph. Also, we learn the following: “Behind these leaders and the co-operating men of goodwill are the Custodians of the Plan, ‘the inner spiritual Government of the Planet.’” Whatever the unity is, the web page makes a point to say “this kingdom is not a Christian kingdom” but rather “These are the people who are building the new world order.” They are also called “Enlightened Ones.” [3]

Screenshot of Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as donors to Lucis Trust/New Group of World Servers. Scrubbed from the internet. Full documentation here.

I’m sure Bill and Melinda were flattered. I’m also suspecting their 30 PR staffers got to work scrubbing the site. They are no longer listed as Financial Partners. In fact, the list does not exist. Neither does the article thanking “George Soros” and “Bill Gates” and saying “the money energy is beginning to flow into new channels.” You can’t even find it on the Wayback Machine, the archive of the internet. But even ten years ago, I had an inkling this documentation might disappear, so I took screenshots of all the information. The files are still in my possession. [4]

Are the Gates’ evil? Again, this is a difficult way to phrase the question. Is Planned Parenthood evil? Was Margaret Sanger evil, the eugenicist who founded the largest performer of abortions? For those who believe abortion is murder, who know it involves killing or dismembering a child in the womb, who detest the idea of population control based on class, ability, and genetic strength, the answer is a resounding Yes. Do the people running Planned Parenthood today think they are evil? No. And they dress nicely. 

Bill and Melinda also dress well. And they seem to really believe their efforts are for the good. So do the leaders of the Lucis Trust, a cause Bill and Melinda Gates have financially supported, to the degree that Bill Gates and George Soros were singled out by Lucis as key donors. Let’s get to the bottom of this allegation that they were once called the “Lucifer Trust.”

Lucis Trust article extolling supporters Bill Gates and George Soros. Scrubbed from the internet. Full documentation here.

The roots of the Lucis Trust trace back to a woman who is credited for inspiring Hitler’s obsession with the occult, the 19th century author and occultist Helena Blavatsky, who discipled the founder of Lucis Trust, Alice Bailey. Blavatsky was a Russian immigrant and self-proclaimed levitating psychic who founded the occult and spiritualist movement called Theosophy, which became wildly popular, especially in Germany. She is “widely considered the ‘mother’ of New Age spirituality as well as a touchstone in the development of Nazi paganism and the chief popularizer of the swastika as a mystical symbol,” writes Jonah Goldberg in National Review. 

“The occult revival in Germany and in Europe in general in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries led to a remarkable growth of Theosophic lodges as well as other occult groups,” writes author C. M. Vasey. He says there are “parallels between Blavatsky’s esoteric thought and Hitler’s racial ideology” and connects Blavatsky’s “Cyclopean eye” and the elevation of the Aryan race with themes later championed by Hitler. 

Madam H. P. Blavatsky

Blavatsky hardly concealed the true focus of her occult leanings. In an 1885 book, she writes: “It is but natural . . . to view Satan, the Serpent of Genesis, as the real creator and benefactor, the Father of Spiritual mankind.” In another passage she extols “the ‘Harbinger of Light,’ bright radiant Lucifer,” who opened the eyes of Adam. [5]

Blavatsky’s Theosophy magazine was edited by Alice Bailey, who called the levitating admirer of Satan her mentor, dedicating one of her books to Blavatsky, “that great disciple who lighted her torch in the east and brought the light to Europe and America.” Bailey went on to found the Lucis Trust, and Blavatsky’s works are promoted on the Lucis Trust website. [6]

The Lucis website displays a great many of Bailey’s beliefs on their site. But certain Alice Bailey teachings listed on the site a few years ago are discoverable now only on the Wayback machine. In 2000, the site noted that Bailey and her followers at Lucis look for the “return of the ‘World Teacher,’ the Coming One Who will return to lead humanity into a new age and into a heightened consciousness.” In 1998, the website had another interesting sentence: “Today the reappearance of the World Teacher, the Christ, is expected by millions, not only by those of Christian faith but by those of every faith who expect the Avatar under other names -- the Lord Maitreya, Krishna, Messiah, Imam Mahdi and the Bodhisattva.” 

So who do the Lucis people worship? Internet theories have for years claimed it is Lucifer. Longtime Lucis Trust president Sarah McKechnie discussed the problem of conspiracy theorists in a 2013 interview: “It’s only in more recent years with the internet and this sharing of ideas, no matter how cockamamie they might be, that the internet offers, that we hear more and more from people who are concerned about our name.”

On Good Friday Bill Gates’s Microsoft firm ran an ad featuring prominent satanist Marina Abramovic, who makes “art” out of blood, gore and cannibalism. She poses here with Jacob Rothschild, in front of Sir Thomas Lawrence’s 1797 painting “Satan Summoning His Legions.” In a promotional video posted on Microsoft’s official YouTube account, Abramovic is described as the “most legendary performance artist working now.” After 24,000 down votes, Microsoft pulled the ad. See here and here.

Elsewhere on the Lucis Site, McKechnie writes about “so much confusion and misunderstanding concerning the ’fallen angels’ of which Lucifer is the best-known representative.” [7]

“Anybody’s who’s curious about it, you can go to our website lucistrust.org,” she says in the interview, “and you will find an article explaining the origins of Lucifer and the history of the Lucis Trust. And that should put it to rest.” 

Well, I took her up on the challenge. In fact, I did so ten years ago, and I kept the screenshots. However, as of this writing, the screenshots are not necessary, because the Lucis Trust’s explanation of their name continues to be posted as follows, word for word:

“There are comments on the World Wide Web claiming that the Lucis Trust was once called the Lucifer Trust. Such was never the case. However, for a brief period of two or three years in the early 1920’s, when Alice and Foster Bailey were beginning to publish the books published under her name, they named their fledgling publishing company ‘Lucifer Publishing Company’. By 1925 the name was changed to Lucis Publishing Company and has remained so ever since. Both ‘Lucifer’ and ‘Lucis’ come from the same word root, lucis being the Latin generative case meaning of light. The Baileys› reasons for choosing the original name are not known to us, but we can only surmise that they, like the great teacher H. P. Blavatsky, for whom they had enormous respect, sought to elicit a deeper understanding of the sacrifice made by Lucifer.” [8]

SOURCE: http://dean-w-arnold.com/articles-blogs/2020/4/27/bill-gates-and-the-lucifer-trust-is-there-a-connection#%5B3%5D=

...