Thursday, April 9, 2020

THE GATES' CONNECTIONS TO EUGENICS



4 comments


Shining the light on the Gates family. Photo: UN
In the following, Ethan Nash examines links between COVID-19 ‘solutions’ and social eugenics movements, including Bill Gates Snr and Planned Parenthood, the Gates Foundation and philanthropy deceptions, vested vaccine interests and engineering a pandemic.

THE EUGENICS MOVEMENT

In the late 19th century — a critical time in development of the sciences — British scholar Sir Francis Galton, in his book Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development, coined the term ‘eugenics’.
Galton, whose cousin was Charles Darwin, hoped to ‘better humankind’ through the ‘science of improving the human species’ by selectively mating people with specific desirable hereditary traits. 
Decades of research on ‘controlled breeding’, including through means of sterilization, soon became accepted mainstream science at the turn of the century and the eugenics movement was born. 
Supporters of eugenics believe people inherit mental illness, criminal tendencies and even poverty, and that these conditions can be ‘bred out’ of the human gene pool through forced sterilization. Not surprisingly, ‘undesirable’ traits were concentrated in poor, uneducated and minority populations.
Many professionals in the scientific and biological fields rigorously researched ways to ‘improve the human race’ through means of eliminating these ‘negative traits’, and the movement would soon garner widespread political support — particularly in Australia.
As we have explored, the likes of Professor Richard Berry and growing Eugenics Societies of NSW and Victoria played a pivotal role in mass campaigns for laws allowing the establishment of a ”lethal chamber” to euthanise what these groups called ”the grosser types of our mental defectives”
Following World War I, numerous eugenics-based ideologies were beginning to enter mainstream societies across the world. However, after Hitler would adopt these concepts and implement an aggressive form of the concept, the world grew sour and a new change was needed to continue.

CULTURAL MARXISM

The concepts of eugenics were not exorcised from Western thinking following World War II, rather, they went underground or and were reinvented by assuming more “compassionate” guises. 
Julian Huxley’s significant contributions to the movement ensured that the underlying notions associated with eugenics would transform and continue into new social movements.
During the 1950s, these groups would re-define eugenics as ‘socially progressive’, with linkages to the newly formed and comprehensive welfare states that offered ‘solutions’ to poverty and disease.
The Rockefeller Foundation heavily financed the modern eugenics movement and think-tanks such as the Tavistock Institute would give birth to many influential individuals and ‘social’ organisations.
Huxley adeptly associated the ‘new and modern’ eugenics movement with a range of reformist ideologies, such as the popularisation of birth control, the decriminalisation of homosexuality and abortion law reform. He described this process as “eugenic modernisation”.
The basic premise remained the same, however: it is far easier to eliminate the poor and the suffering, than it is to eliminate the complex and tenacious sources of their poverty or their suffering.
These people believe the masses are too moronic to govern themselves.
A plethora of new-age organisations and movements would arise during the era of ‘counter-culture’, and this ‘progression’ continued, the now-notorious Gates family would soon enter the picture.

BILL GATES SNR AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD



Photo: WUM
The key to understanding Bill Gates’ exposure to eugenic concepts is to trace his family past.
Bill Gates’ father, William H. Gates, Sr.was a prominent banker and a lawyer in Preston Gates & Ellis. He also presided over many bar associations, organisation boards and started the Technology Alliance — a regional push to expand technology-based jobs throughout the 20th century.
Importantly, Gates Sr. served on the board of Planned Parenthood (PP) during the group’s infancy — a re-branded organisation birthed out of the American Eugenics Society.
The company spread from beginnings in Cold Spring Harbor genetics and virology labs on Long Island and Berlin, to today become one of the largest organisations in the US. Rockefeller-Bayar Co., BASF and Hoechst petrochemical-pharmaceutical consortium were all initial funders of the group.
Make no mistake: Planned Parenthood was built on population control schemes — allied with the same groups who wanted genetic hierarchy laws to ‘preserve’ humanity and who sought to ‘beautify’ countries by stopping the “unfit” from reproducing. 
In their 2014 Annual Report, the pro-abortion and anti-family group reported seeing over 2.5 million patients in over 4 million clinical visits, including 324,000 abortions. The group claims to be a proponent of ‘free choice’, yet it is a eugenics front organisation in disguise.
Planned Parent has recently gone through their second executive in just eight months, after sacking President Leana Wen for daring to suggest the group should focus more on women’s health.
Does this sound like a group that dedicated to improving society? This one showdown revealed a genuine rift in the organization and a simple truth: promoting ‘women’s health’ was always a cover.
Bill Gates proudly speaks on his father’s involvement on the board of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on the concept that most human beings are just “reckless breeders”.
Gates’ father would take the concepts learned at Planned Parenthood and incorporate them into building the foundational blueprint for a new era of philanthropy activities that remain to this day.

THE GATES FOUNDATION

William Gates Snr. would continue his eugenicist efforts by becoming instrumental in the formation of a new philanthropic brainchild called the William H. Gates Foundation in 1994.
The group, like Planned Parenthood, would first focus on ‘improving’ reproductive and child health in the developing world. After pioneering philanthropist activities, the company merged with the new Gates Learning Foundation to create the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000.
The methodologies have evolved leaps-and-bounds since the early formation of the movement, however the objective remains the same. This time, the new multifaceted approach would see the philanthropist group partner with powerful United Nations organizations like the World Health Organisation (WHO) and UNICEF.
Today, the group is focused on many areas that drive continued work across the world. These activities have given birth to new forms of technological, eugenic endeavours.
The organisation is simply continuing the Gates family legacy of trying to dominate and control the world’s systems, including in the areas of technology, medicine and now agriculture.
In 2010, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation purchased 500,000 shares in Monsanto valued at more than $23 million. This is when it became abundantly clear that the so-called benevolent charity is up to something other than ‘eradicating’ disease and feeding the world’s poor.
The evidence that GMOs cause disease has been piling up for decades, as the list of countries banning their import and cultivation grows. Bill openly promotes GMOs as the ‘answer’ to world hunger, but many think this is in exactly the same vein as when the British Army handed small pox-infested blankets out to desperate American Indians during the French and Indian War.
Melinda Gates has also made ‘women’s issues’ one of the top priorities for their philanthropic work. This includes the decision to elevate contraception-promotion and population control as “arguably the single-most important part of her work”. She has been openly criticised for these moves.
In 2017, the Gates Foundation pledged another $375 million for ‘family planning’, with the goal of providing contraception to 120 million women across the world, particularly in developing countries.
This emphasis on blanketing developing countries with artificial contraception for which women aren’t asking for reeks of social engineering and paternalistic eugenicist thinking. 
The fact that couples in developing countries often desire and value large families means nothing to many Western elitist philanthropists: the not-so-subliminal underlying presumption is that women who desire large families simply don’t know what’s good for them. As such, they need to be educated and ‘encouraged’ with large-scale, foreign-funded advertising companies and coercion.
Now that we have explored the history of the Gates family, influences and aims of philanthropist philosophies and modern eugenics programs across the world, let’s explore the relatable picture.

BILL GATES AND VACCINES

Bill Gates needs no introduction. He is one of the most influential Polyergus of all time. For 25 years, he has controlled what has grown to become a multibillion-dollar colossus, Microsoft, and made himself one of the richest men in the world. The tech world was largely born through Gates.
He accomplished this feat not by inventing new technology, but by taking existing technology, adapting it to a ‘specific market’, and then dominating that market.
In recent years, Gates has turned a good deal of his attention towards philanthropy by creating the largest private foundation in the world, with over $46 billion in assets. He has secured billions of dollars in contributions from other wealthy benefactors such as Warren Buffett, and is primarily dedicated to ‘enhancing healthcare’ and ‘alleviating poverty’ across the world.
Bill Gates is heavily involved in development of new vaccines, as well as ‘forecasting’ international health challenges of tomorrow (such as preparing for epidemics), and works beyond the scope of national oversight and accountability in most cases.
He has spent years involved in the vaccine-manufacturing process, including quality control and clinical evaluation. This understanding has allowed Gates to ‘advise’ vaccine development programs and fund research into new areas of innovation for multiple disease programs:


Source: B&MGF
Gates invests in expertise and platform technologies that help us make vaccines faster, ‘better’ and cheaper, in addition to also investing in numerous education and training programs to ensure that knowledge around vaccines is created, shared and retained. Some examples of this include:
  • Adaptive trial designs.
  • Streamlining the schedule and dosing of vaccines.
  • Novel delivery formats for vaccines.
  • Modular, automated manufacturing platforms enabling small-batch vaccine production.
The billionaire was an early investing partner in the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), which has now grown a substantial portfolio of public-private international health partnerships that are committed to increasing access to immunisation.
Today, GAVI has grown significantly. The group brings together developing country and donor governments (including Australia), the World Health Organization, UNICEF, the World Bank, the vaccine industry, research and technical agencies, civil society and other private philanthropists.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has donated $1.56 billion to the alliance’s 2016-2020 strategic period as of March 2019, and continues to advise the group on key business decisions.
Gates heavy involvement in the vaccine industry, in addition to continuing the eugenicists visions of the ‘social’ reformation, was fundamental in framing his positive public perception on the matter.
Considered a ‘hero’ in the fight to develop new technologies against growing diseases, the stage had now been set for Gates to become the new ‘go to’ voice if a pandemic was to ever break out.

COVID-19: A PLAN-DEMIC?

‘PREDICTING’ AN OUTBREAK

The Microsoft co-founder has hinted on multiple occasions over the past decade that the potential for something like the coronavirus that would soon arise and the world must be ‘ready’.
In 2015, Bill Gates gave a TED Talk titled, The next outbreak? We’re not ready, which is being shared widely online in recent weeks given the impact of COVID-19 across the world.
The part of the talk that’s making rounds online shows Gates explaining that while the greatest threat to humanity when he was growing up was nuclear war, the greatest threat now is a virus:
“If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. Not missiles, but microbes.”
However, as we have explored, there is no fundamental evidence to suggest a threat from the CoronaHoax, which has been invented as a means to usher in further mechanisms of control.
Rather, through these ‘cryptic’ messages, Gates was positioning himself in a positive light to connect with the public psyche. If something was to happen, ‘Gates would know the solution!’, they will cry.
Did Gates know something we didn’t know in advance? Emerging evidence suggest this ‘pandemic’ was foretold by the billionaire, which now serves as the mechanism to further carry out the agenda.

EVENT 201

On October 18, 2019, The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, which is described on the group’s website as “a high-level pandemic exercise” carried out in New York.
The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be ‘necessary’ during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences:
“Experts agree that it is only a matter of time before one of these epidemics becomes global — a pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences. A severe pandemic, which becomes ‘Event 201’, would require reliable cooperation among several industries, national governments, and key international institutions.”
The group claims they did not ‘predict’ the coronavirus, despite modelling their pandemic under the same name. However, when examining their documents, striking similarities begin to emerge:
“Event 201 simulated an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen was modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.
There is no possibility of a vaccine being available in the first year.
Let’s think: The ‘real’ coronavirus started over a bat in a meat market, transmitted to humans and shows mild symptoms. The vaccine is also 12-18 months away from being developed.
Furthermore, the Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation funded a research center in England called the Pirbright Institute, which specialises in the study of viruses that affect farm animals, and viruses which transfer from animals to people. They own a very similar patent for a type of coronavirus affecting animals.
The world fell for the deception, hook line and sinker. Now, nations are crying out for a ‘solution’ to the growing COVID-19 ‘crisis’ and Bill Gates (not surprisingly) has emerged at the head of the pack.

GATES TO THE RESCUE

Bill Gates is now the talk of the town, and in a recent interview, he told The Daily Show that his foundation was funding the construction of factories for seven coronavirus vaccine ‘candidates’.
He says the foundation would end up picking only one or two of the seven, meaning billions of dollars spent on manufacturing would be abandoned. However, spending a few billion to capitalise on the growing $35 billion vaccine market seems like a calculated investment.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has already committed $100 million to fighting coronavirus, as part of its broader efforts in international health. The group is also reportedly exploring the idea of supplying at-home testing kits for the coronavirus.
It also launched a $125 million COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator and gave $5 million to help public health agencies in the Seattle area ‘enhance their capacity’ to detect the virus.
So, a man who has profited largely off vaccine development for years and also held ‘simulations’ of pandemic outbreaks is now cashing in on the chase to develop a COVID-19 vaccine? How fitting.
Gates ultimate influence in this unfolding plan can be found in the instructions given in recent weeks.

THE ‘ONLY WAY OUT’

Bill Gates now has a net worth of $97.8 billion. Yet, being the ‘relatable’ person that he is, took to reddit for an Ask Me Anything on the COVID-19 pandemic. He would share his thoughts on ‘how best to deal’ with the outbreak and explored possible long-term effects on the world.
Gates said that broad vaccination for COVID-19 will need to become available “before you can be completely safe”. Until then, according to his claims, there’s a risk that communities could rebound unless they continue to practice strict social distancing and quarantines to see case numbers level off.  
Gates said he doesn’t think large gatherings will be able to resume until widespread vaccination has taken place, as the ‘risks would outweigh the benefits’ of such events: 



World leaders also agree with Gates’ timeline and perspectives. Shortly after doing the media rounds, the Australian government hinted at the fact society will be in lockdown until a vaccine is developed. This was soon followed by the New South Wales government and others.
Furthermore, Gates called for a national tracking system similar to South Korea, saying that “in Seattle, the University of Washington is providing thousands of tests per day, but no one is connected to a national tracking system”. He said that whenever there is a positive test, it should be used to understand where the disease is and whether we need to strengthen the social distancing.
In the future, he has floated the idea of ‘vaccine certificates’ to show proof-of-vaccination following the widespread rollout of COVID-19 products. This would be a new requirement for international and domestic travel, and is tipped to further expand to all facets of life.
Given the context detailed in this feature piece, do you trust the intentions of this man?
Gates has a rich history of eugenics influence and partakes in activities across the world that further progress the aims of the original movement, albeit in disguise.
Such is the story of the Dehumanization of Humanity. The ‘death of god’ lead to parasites believing they were gods, and this premise serves as the underlying force driving the transhumanist era.
Using objectivist logic, we must all exercise the precautionary principle when approaching Gates’ claims to ‘improve’ health through vaccines.
If a COVID-19 vaccine uses strains of an actual virus, as many do, in order to encourage the body to build immunization, subjects who receive the vaccine will be carriers of that virus.
Bill Gates, and the forces that drive this puppet, are pushing the world towards a choice: Take the COVID-19 vaccine and deal with the health consequences, or refuse and be denied basic services and after being labelled as a ‘health threat’. Take the jab or be targeted.
I know where I stand.
Will you be lining up to receive the newly developed Gates-funded vaccine?
Stay tuned for more.

RELATED CONTENT

The immense impact of Bill Gates Sr. | University of Washington Magazine

DEEP STATE IS RUNNING THE COVID TASK FORCE: Part 2

PREAMBLE: I was intending to write about George Cardinal Pell subsequent to his release from prison just yesterday. The aspect that I intended to cover was the situation he must have found himself in as the papal appointee to get the Vatican books in order [and presumably to clean up any corruption], on finding corruption inter alia with the papal foundation donated monies from the millionaire benefactors in the U.S. and the Peter's Pence donations world-wide generally. It's widely known that the PP donations have been misused to pay off administrative costs and debts rather than being directed to charitable works. It is not so well known - or wasn't a few years ago - that the recipient for donated funds was a recently disfunctional small hospital in Rome called the Derrnatological Institute of the Immaculate. Although once legitimately operational, it was cleared of bona fide staff who were replaced with stooges who would be complicit in running the show as a front for money laundering into off shore untraceable accounts for certain high profile people, including bishops presumably. Kathy Clubb wrote a recent article touching on this particular matter, and others have written of the scandal [ links below], but I hadn't seen mentioned that this involved "pope" Francis - and from memory I believe it does [and this is what I was intending to research and write about - but I have been waylaid by the allied topic of the Coronavirus Task Force because I have discovered while researching that the USCCB and Catholic Relief Services are intimately linked with the Task Force players' linked organisations].

From memory, many wealthy American Catholic philanthropists donate to the papal foundation and disperse monies from the pool upon request and discretion. The maximum amount granted to any cause is, I believe, $200,000. A few years ago, at the request of Francis himself, they were asked to give $25 million. I seem to recall that they bawked at this and gave $2 million [ but since I haven't got into the research, I am working from an aging memory]. And, they were none too happy with the eventualities upon finding out the situation with this hospital.

The Church Militant article on financial corruption included this on the hospital fiasco .....

"Recent reports also reveal that a curial official admitted to using American grant money to write off a questionable 50-million-euro loan to a scandal-ridden Rome hospital. 
The hospital in question, the Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata (IDI), was investigated and indicted in 2016 for embezzlement, money laundering and tax fraud to the tune of nearly 1 billion euros. 
After securing the loan, IDI was unable to repay the amount — leading to the Vatican's attempt to recoup its losses through securing a grant via the U.S.-based Papal Foundation. The Vatican's Secretary of State Cdl. Pietro Parolin recently admitted to being behind  the controversial $25 million loan, rammed through with the help of Washington, D.C.'s Cdl. Donald Wuerl.
The grant led to an internal uprising among Papal Foundation members in 2017, with a number resigning in protest.
While Parolin has pledged to repay the loan, the terms remain broad and undefined — with no signatory on the loan, no interest rate and no penalties assessed for failure to repay — leading to further internal unrest and criticism among members of the foundation.
KATHY CLUBB'S ARTICLE HERE: https://www.fli.org.au/operation-get-pell-were-the-bullets-made-in-rome/?fbclid=IwAR07DIVemdwFj9u8jpVqUOCLJ4dTaFHgHTFV97-WtfNpvQrRfKbuzLF0qbs

PART 1 IS HERE: https://austroz.blogspot.com.knightslite.com/2020/04/deep-state-are-running-covid-task-force.html?fbclid=IwAR0rKHePHeTTuh_93nrEHDeLwfHfW4IVhdKFy45_rzq8RfFnM1K26Pwv1lk

.         *******************************************************************************




NOW, TO THE TOPIC INDICATED........... THE TASK FORCE PLAYERS AND CONNECTED ORGANISATIONS AND ALLIES.

FIRST, THE CONNECTIONS WITH THE U.S. CONFERENCE of CATHOLIC BISHOPS and the CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES.  [ I will let Michael Hichborn of Lepanto Institute give his summary, after which YOU MUST WATCH THE VIDEO BY AMAZING POLLY TO UNDERSTAND THE INTER-CONNECTIONS AND ALL THE PLAYERS INVOLVED].



US Bishop Conference Lobbies Congress to Fund Agency Funding Planned Parenthood


The US Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) and Catholic Relief Services (CRS) have once again written to Congress requesting “robust funding” for two agencies deeply committed to the promotion and distribution of contraception, one of which provides millions of dollars to Planned Parenthood.
In a 1 December 2017 joint letter to the director for the Office of Management and Budget, and copied to all members of Congress, Archbishop Broglio, the USCCB’s chairman for the Committee on International Justice and Peace, and Sean Callahan, the president of Catholic Relief Services, urged Congress to “fully fund” both PEPFAR and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria.
Despite acknowledging in the letter that both PEPFAR and the Global Fund are highly involved in the distribution of contraception, neither the USCCB nor CRS asks for the cessation of those immoral activities in its bid for Congress to provide American tax dollars to both projects.  Key portions of the letter read:
With the approach of World AIDS Day on December 1, we write to urge that the administration’s budget request for FY19 fully fund U.S. global HIV and AIDS programs …
Although we have principled concerns about those PEPFAR and Global Fund prevention activities we find inconsistent with Catholic teaching and do not implement or advocate for these activities, we support the lifesaving missions of PEPFAR and the Global Fund and urge robust funding for both programs
As you craft the 2019 budget, we urge you to protect HIV and AIDS programs from efforts to reduce funding or to alter the U.S. Government’s PEPFAR strategy in ways that would diminish the progress we have made.
As we’ve reported before, PEPFAR is deeply involved in the promotion and distribution of contraception, including abortifacients.  For instance, in a section on PEPFAR’s website titled, “Linking HIV/AIDS to Women’s and Children’s Health,” PEPFAR makes clear that its work to fight HIV/AIDS includes the promotion and spread of contraception.  PEPFAR says:
As part of its overall prevention, care and support, and treatment efforts, PEPFAR is leveraging and linking HIV services to broader delivery mechanisms that improve health outcomes for women and children. Some of these activities include:
  • Expanding integration of HIV prevention, care and support, and treatment services with family planning and reproductive health services, so that women living with HIV can access necessary care, and so that all women know how to protect themselves from HIV infection
In 2016, a representative of the USCCB reluctantly admitted that PEPFAR does indeed promote and distribute condoms, but claimed that PEPFAR is not permitted to distribute or pay for other forms of contraception.
While PEPFAR is prohibited from directly funding or distributing abortifacient contraception, it establishes a framework for such distribution, allowing other organizations like USAID to provide the contraception to people in PEPFAR projects.
The Global Fund, on the other hand, not only funds the distribution of contraception, but actually provides large grants to the world’s largest abortion network, Planned Parenthood.
Here are just a few examples of the grant disbursements from the Global Fund to Planned Parenthood affiliates world-wide.
From 2012-2015, the Global Fund provided over $13 million to the Indonesian Planned Parenthood Association.
In another grant from 2009-2013, the Global Fund provided an additional $9 million to the same Planned Parenthood affiliate.
In Ghana, from 2009-2015, the Global Fund provided the Planned Parenthood Association of Ghana with over $3 million.
In another grant to the Planned Parenthood Association of Ghana, which ran from 2015-2017, the Global Fund provided $1.4 million.
In Nigeria, from 2010-2015, the Global Fund provided $6.6 million to the Planned Parenthood Federation of Nigeria.
In addition to funding Planned Parenthood, the Global Fund is promoting homosexuality and transgenderism, as can be seen from this Global Fund publication in 2012:
In 2014, the Global Fund boasted that the work of a self-professed “Condom Man” in Vietnam was supported by the Global Fund:
In January of 2017, the Global Fund published a fact-sheet which provides data that “corresponds to Global Fund’s actual mid-2016 results.”  Page 2 of that fact-sheet shows that the number one indicator for its HIV programs … by far … was the distribution of 5.28 billion condoms.
The USCCB/CRS letter to Congress claims that PEPFAR saved 11 million lives and Global Fund saved 22 million lives.  But the question here is, “how many souls did these agencies destroy in the process?”  In his 1930 encyclical, Casti Connubii, Pope Pius XI exclaims:
“Since, therefore, the conjugal act is destined primarily by nature for the begetting of children, those who in exercising it deliberately frustrate its natural power and purpose sin against nature and commit a deed which is shameful and intrinsically vicious.”
In other words, the deliberate use of acts, devices or potions which prevent conception are all intrinsically evil.  When the USCCB and CRS ask Congress to provide “robust funding” to these two agencies, they are asking Congress to use American tax dollars to fund the spread of contraception.  And in the case of the Global Fund, the USCCB and CRS are asking Congress to fund the funders of Planned Parenthood.
While Catholics are left scratching their heads, asking “Why on Earth would the USCCB and CRS ask Congress to take my money and fund two agencies that are notorious in the promotion of intrinsic evils?”  The answer is very simple as it all comes down to the money that CRS would get out of it.
The PEPFAR website which tracks all of its grants to various organizations indicates that PEPFAR has allocated over $892 million to Catholic Relief Services since the year 2005.  This does not include the money CRS has received through PEPFAR as a result of being a sub-partner on other PEPFAR projects where CRS was not the principle recipient of the grant.
It’s difficult to know exactly how much CRS has received from the Global Fund over the years because the Global Fund website isn’t as comprehensive as PEPFAR’s.  That said, we have been able to confirm that CRS has received at least $264,226,459 from the Global Fund for 10 different grants.  The amounts are as follows:
Of course, all of this funding is in direct contradiction with Article 10 § 3 of Pope Benedict XVI’s 2012 motu proprio On the Service of Charity, which commands the bishop to whom a charitable organization answers “to ensure that charitable agencies dependent upon him do not receive financial support from groups or institutions that pursue ends contrary to Church’s teaching.”
Our Blessed Lord was very clear when He said that one cannot serve both God and mammon.  And when the USCCB and CRS ask Congress to take American tax dollars … your money, our money, and the money of over 70 million other registered Catholics in the US … and give “robust” amounts of it to the contraception-promoting and distributing PEPFAR and the Planned Parenthood-funding Global Fund, just so they can sweeten their own bids for funding, it becomes abundantly clear whom they are serving.
Contact the USCCB and CRS and tell them that it is unacceptable for the Catholic Church to be lobbying Congress to fund agencies that are spreading grave evils throughout the world:
Catholic Relief Services: 877-435-7277 info@crs.org
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops: 202-541-3196 scolecchi@usccb.org

LINK: https://web.archive.org/web/20181117201506/http://www.lepantoinstitute.org/usccb/us-bishop-conference-lobbies-congress-fund-agency-funding-planned-parenthood/


.               ************************************************************************************


DEEP STATE IS RUNNING THE COVID TASK FORCE: Part 1.

The Pence appointed Dr. Fauci, along with his sidekick, Dr. Birx, are supposedly heading the fight to mitigate the virus, SARS-Cov2, which results in the illness known as Covid-19 and declared to be a pandemic which in turn has prompted governments to severely restrict the movements of citizens to the extent of denying natural rights. By now, this is all well known.

What is not well known is that Fauci and Birx have intimate ties, personal and financial, to the big players in the Pharma Deep State, to wit: Bill Gates, George Soros, and other individuals as well as W.H.O., ID2020, WEF, PREPFAR, and various other organisations, along with vaccine and drug companies, especially Burroughs Wellcome. I can add to these the U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops and the Catholic Relief Service [which I will deal with in Part 2].

WHY HAVE I CLAIMED THAT THEY "SUPPOSEDLY LEAD THE FIGHT TO MITIGATE THE EFFECTS OF COVID-19"?  I have said this based on their modus operandi thus far, which has been [1] to promulgate overblown modeling of the infected and the likely death rate to add a panic and fear element to gain the subservience of the population to their instructions, and [2] to attribute deaths to Covid-19 which may be due to other causes.

AND WHY WOULD THEY DO THIS? In short: to gain time to bring a vaccine or drug on the market from which they can profit. Hence, this is the reason that Dr. Fauci in particular, along with others with a vested interest, have downplayed the efficacy of the anti-malarial drug, Chloroquine, [as well as other drugs mainly associated with HIV mitigation], which in some jurisdictions has been banned or has had approval delayed. For the sake of brevity I will omit the many links available to support this claim. Links are readily available showing Bill Gates advocating for the world population to be vaccinated - along with the inclusion of a nano-chip which certifies said vaccination. Along with this plea, Gates has said he does not want to see a lot of survivors with immunity !! [Refer the TED talks]. I will here give away the Gotcha Moment very early by telling you that, thanks to the research of "Amazing Polly", there is a Ms. Birx [unknown yet if she is related], who works directly for the Gates Foundation, a daughter is connected to Rep, Feinstein whose chauffeur of 20 years was known to be a Chinese CCP spy.

Below is pictured from 1990 a protest against Fauci by the gay community. The reason for this protest was that Fauci was heading the fight against AIDS and was not considered to be doing enough to employ a mitigating medication to stop deaths from the epidemic of HIV.






WHAT HAPPENED LATER?

Fauci pressured the government and FDA to rush through a medication for widespread use before trials were completed known as AZT. The drug AZT was a toxin used unsuccessfully for cancer 20 years earlier. It was totally unnecessary according to some virologists as shown in the video below by Prof. E.Michael Jones who claims additionally that Fauci's actions were responsible for many deaths. Further, he claims that Fauci was desperate to appease the homosexual community by displaying that the heterosexual were also susceptible to AIDS to obviate the stigma attached to gays and their lifestyle. Prof. Jones now makes the analogy with COVID-19 in that Fauci is indulging in scientism over reason in his tactics to design the circumstances of the need to lockdown society until the vaccine is ready. BUT, dear reader, I have only just noted references suggesting that there are moves to stop resisting the approval of Chloroquinine as there are moves to COMBINE IT WITH AZT as a proprietary medication !! [I will have to add references to this at a later date]. News is coming out daily that vaccine trials are progressing quickly anyway, so more will be added on that subject later.

FURTHER REFERENCE: https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2020/04/05/is-what-were-being-told-about-the-coronavirus-pandemic-wrong-n2566373 

.                                              **********************************

NOW, BACK TO THE [1] Modeling false paradigm, and [2] The attribution of uncertain causes of deaths to COVID-19.


These snaps ought to be enough to cast doubt and suspicion on how deaths are being recorded so I will let them speak for themselves.





I haven't heard Dr. Birx reiterate the above instructions but this tweeter does as follows....


Well, Dr. Birx just said it. Anyone in U.S. who dies with Covid 19, regardless of what else may be wrong, is now being recorded as a Covid 19 death.
.                                                   *********************************


NOW FOR POINT [2] Modeling. 

There are a multitude of references made by qualified people. I will take the view of Dr. Wm.Briggs. SOURCE: https://wmbriggs.com/post/30236/  


Yesterday I showed the deaths/cases plot. I speculated the “plot is still rocketing northwards means (1) cases are under-reported (lack of measurement), (2) deaths over-attributed (dying with is not same as dying from), or (3) both.” (1) is surely happening, but Hume’s tweet is proof (2) is, too.
Adjusting numbers is one good way to boost numbers to get them to align closer to forecasts.
Blaze has a list (thanks to David Legates for this) of model predictions.
Summary (all are quotes):
  • Think Global: Total U.S. deaths: 1.64 million. Social distancing taken into account? No.
  • CDC: Total U.S. deaths: 200,000 to 1.7 million. Social distancing taken into account? No.
  • Imperial College of London: Total U.S. deaths: 2.2 million. Social distancing taken into account? … might reduce peak healthcare demand by 2/3 and deaths by half.
  • University of Massachusetts – Amherst: Total U.S. deaths: 195,000 by the end of the year. Social distancing taken into account? …had the option to account for measures in their answers.
  • The Coronavirus Task Force Model: Total U.S. deaths: 100,000 to 240,000. Social distancing taken into account? Yes
  • Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation: Total U.S. deaths: 81,766. Social Distancing taken into account? Yes, model assumes full social distancing through May. [MAY!]
…27 studies describing 31 prediction models were included…
This review indicates that proposed models are poorly reported, at high risk of bias, and their reported performance is probably optimistic. Immediate sharing of well documented individual participant data from covid-19 studies is needed for collaborative efforts to develop more rigorous prediction models and validate existing ones…Methodological guidance should be followed because unreliable predictions could cause more harm than benefit in guiding clinical decisions.
This is harsh considering we’re not even at the end, yet.
The AP has an article by the usual suspects expressing wonder scientific models can be wrong: Modeling coronavirus: Uncertainty is the only certainty’.
The only problem with this bit of relatively good news? It’s almost certainly wrong. All models are wrong. Some are just less wrong than others — and those are the ones that public health officials rely on.
Welcome to the grimace-and-bear-it world of modeling.

THE ONE CHURCH ESTABLISHED BY CHRIST: Does it "subsist in" or "is it" the Catholic Church

  POSTED BELOW IS THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF Fr. MINCINELLA'S VIEW AS RECORDED IN "RADIO SPADA" The theme of  subsistit in  is...