The willing acceptance by the public to allow big tech to spy on you and divulge your location data to government agencies, health authorities and police agencies around the world is a continuation of the Track and Trace agenda.
By General Maddox.
As the weeks go by in the age of virus hysteria we begin to see more and more ridiculous control measures taking place under the guise of “stopping the spread and flattening the curve”. Each time I venture out into the public to grab the weekly necessities I notice more and more social engineering tactics being deployed. From staff members making the public line up outside of the grocery store and counting the in’s and out’s of customers to plastic “shields” being erected at checkouts or X’s marking the spot on the ground where I am supposed to stand to staff members not allowing customers into pharmacies without a mandatory squirt of hand sanitiser. The hypocrisy and stupidity of it all is mind numbing.
We’re being made to feel like we’re all “patient zero”, carriers of some deadly pathogen that’s responsible for the deaths of thousands worldwide. With the almost weekly advent of more and more control measures being implemented it’s getting to the point where the public at large acquiesces to the demands of the health authorities and complies without question because they’re trained to believe it’s for the greater good of the public.
In the days to come more measures are going to be introduced. More control. Tighter restrictions and now willing acceptance of surveillance of those thought to have a positive diagnosis of COVID-19 or whom have been in close proximity to someone with a positive diagnosis and therefore said to be possibly asymptomatic.
But it doesn’t stop there. Surveillance measures are now being used enforce the abhorrent social distancing rules applied to us. Western Australian police will begin uses drones to spy on the public to spot any potential free-thinkers whom disobey big brother.
As described in a piece via TOTTnews.com:
A team at the University of South Australia is currently designing a “pandemic” drone to detect virus symptoms such as fever and coughing from a distance. Valuable as that is now, this tool could easily be used to intrusively manage the public’s health after the crisis is over.
But it doesn’t stop there. Drones aren’t the only issue with these new Track and Trace measures. Information syphoned from your phones location data is now being handed over to authorities.
More draconian measures being used to enforce social distancing includes what’s deemed ‘Smart Tracking’ which can identify the movement of the public using metadata from your mobile phone which of course we have been acclimated to take with us everywhere. Telecommunications companies are willingly handing over your location data to authorities and we’re being told this will allow them to help clamp down on those disobeying social distancing rules.
The two companies, usually fierce rivals, said they would work together in the coming weeks to build new tools that would enable people and health authorities to track the virus using Bluetooth proximity data from their smartphones.
The most frightening of the tools is to build a tracing system right into the operation systems of the iOS and Android platforms of our smartphones. These would most likely come out in a couple of months hidden away in an innocuous system update.
The way it’s supposed to aid in stopping the spread of this “deadly” coronavirus is that apps on your phone would log Bluetooth signals received by other nearby devices. If someone you came in contact with then tests positive for coronavirus, you would get a notification from a health authority advising you of exposure and demanding self isolation.
This of course means that anyone who tests positive is having ALL of their location data immediately shared from your service provider to the authorities. Talk about Big Brother!
So what’s next?
Perhaps you decide to simply leave your phone at home to avoid these draconian track and trace measures. It seems that in the not-too-distant future this might not matter.
Elon Musk plans to have your brain directly hooked up to computers. And the addition of his 46,000 5G satellites which will be circling the globe 24/7 will allow the connectivity of these brain devices.
Musk founded Neuralink Corp. in July 2016 to create “ultra-high bandwidth brain-machine interfaces to connect humans and computers.” The company said in 2017 that its initial goal was to devise brain interfaces to alleviate the symptoms of chronic medical conditions.
Musk also went on to say that he will require finding a way for the brain to “merge” with AI, most likely through tiny wireless chips implanted in the brain through a 2-millimeter incision to create what he called “some sort of symbiosis with artificial intelligence,” with a goal of no less than securing “humanity’s future as a civilization relative to AI.” Source.
Will the public soon acquiesce to receive these draconian surveillance measures? Or will it take another pandemic hoax before it’s deemed a necessary action?
libertymavenstock Medium Sun, 05 Apr 2020 18:54 UTC
In the last 3-5 days, a mountain of anecdotal evidence has come out of NYC, Italy, Spain, etc. about COVID-19 and characteristics of patients who get seriously ill. It's not only piling up but now leading to a general field-level consensus backed up by a few previously little-known studies that we've had it all wrong the whole time. Well, a few had some things eerily correct (cough Trump cough), especially with Hydroxychloroquine with Azithromicin, but we'll get to that in a minute.
There is no 'pneumonia' nor ARDS. At least not the ARDS with established treatment protocols and procedures we're familiar with. Ventilators are not only the wrong solution, but high pressure intubation can actually wind up causing more damage than without, not to mention complications from tracheal scarring and ulcers given the duration of intubation often required... They may still have a use in the immediate future for patients too far to bring back with this newfound knowledge, but moving forward a new treatment protocol needs to be established so we stop treating patients for the wrong disease.
The past 48 hours or so have seen a huge revelation: COVID-19 causes prolonged and progressive hypoxia (starving your body of oxygen) by binding to the heme groups in hemoglobin in your red blood cells. People are simply desaturating (losing o2 in their blood), and that's what eventually leads to organ failures that kill them, not any form of ARDS or pneumonia. All the damage to the lungs you see in CT scans are from the release of oxidative iron from the hemes, this overwhelms the natural defenses against pulmonary oxidative stress and causes that nice, always-bilateral ground glass opacity in the lungs. Patients returning for re-hospitalization days or weeks after recovery suffering from apparent delayed post-hypoxic leukoencephalopathy strengthen the notion COVID-19 patients are suffering from hypoxia despite no signs of respiratory 'tire out' or fatigue.
Here's the breakdown of the whole process, including some ELI5-level cliff notes. Much has been simplified just to keep it digestible and layman-friendly.
Your red blood cells carry oxygen from your lungs to all your organs and the rest of your body. Red blood cells can do this thanks to hemoglobin, which is a protein consisting of four "hemes". Hemes have a special kind of iron ion, which is normally quite toxic in its free form, locked away in its center with a porphyrin acting as it's 'container'. In this way, the iron ion can be 'caged' and carried around safely by the hemoglobin, but used to bind to oxygen when it gets to your lungs.
When the red blood cell gets to the alveoli, or the little sacs in your lungs where all the gas exchange happens, that special little iron ion can flip between FE2+ and FE3+ states with electron exchange and bond to some oxygen, then it goes off on its little merry way to deliver o2 elsewhere.
Here's where COVID-19 comes in. Its glycoproteins bond to the heme, and in doing so that special and toxic oxidative iron ion is "disassociated" (released). It's basically let out of the cage and now freely roaming around on its own. This is bad for two reasons:
1) Without the iron ion, hemoglobin can no longer bind to oxygen. Once all the hemoglobin is impaired, the red blood cell is essentially turned into a Freightliner truck cab with no trailer and no ability to store its cargo.. it is useless and just running around with COVID-19 virus attached to its porphyrin. All these useless trucks running around not delivering oxygen is what starts to lead to desaturation, or watching the patient's spo2 levels drop. It is INCORRECT to assume traditional ARDS and in doing so, you're treating the WRONG DISEASE. Think of it a lot like carbon monoxide poisoning, in which CO is bound to the hemoglobin, making it unable to carry oxygen. In those cases, ventilators aren't treating the root cause; the patient's lungs aren't 'tiring out', they're pumping just fine. The red blood cells just can't carry o2, end of story. Only in this case, unlike CO poisoning in which eventually the CO can break off, the affected hemoglobin is permanently stripped of its ability to carry o2 because it has lost its iron ion. The body compensates for this lack of o2 carrying capacity and deliveries by having your kidneys release hormones like erythropoietin, which tell your bone marrow factories to ramp up production on new red blood cells with freshly made and fully functioning hemoglobin. This is the reason you find elevated hemoglobin and decreased blood oxygen saturation as one of the 3 primary indicators of whether the shit is about to hit the fan for a particular patient or not.
2) That little iron ion, along with millions of its friends released from other hemes, are now floating through your blood freely. As I mentioned before, this type of iron ion is highly reactive and causes oxidative damage. It turns out that this happens to a limited extent naturally in our bodies and we have cleanup & defense mechanisms to keep the balance. The lungs, in particular, have 3 primary defenses to maintain "iron homeostasis", 2 of which are in the alveoli, those little sacs in your lungs we talked about earlier. The first of the two are little macrophages that roam around and scavenge up any free radicals like this oxidative iron. The second is a lining on the walls (called the epithelial surface) which has a thin layer of fluid packed with high levels of antioxidant molecules.. things like abscorbic acid (AKA Vitamin C) among others. Well, this is usually good enough for naturally occurring rogue iron ions but with COVID-19 running rampant your body is now basically like a progressive state letting out all the prisoners out of the prisons... it's just too much iron and it begins to overwhelm your lungs' countermeasures, and thus begins the process of pulmonary oxidative stress. This leads to damage and inflammation, which leads to all that nasty stuff and damage you see in CT scans of COVID-19 patient lungs. Ever noticed how it's always bilateral? (both lungs at the same time) Pneumonia rarely ever does that, but COVID-19 does... EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
Holy Week stopped at 10, resumed at midnight. There were even a few ‘Alleluia’s’ doing the rounds.
Last Tuesday, our highest-ranking Australian prelate was released from a maximum-security prison amid cheers from the other inmates. Cardinal George Pell had spent more than four hundred days behind bars for the ignominious crime of child sexual abuse. The evidence against him had been flimsy at best, but that hadn’t stopped a barrage of hatred from being piled on Pell and the Catholic Church for the past four years by the public, egged on by a coordinated media campaign run by amoral progressives.
The lack of evidence hadn’t stopped a jury from finding the Cardinal guilty and hadn’t deterred two Supreme Court judges who were determined to see this man stay behind bars until he died. A third Supreme Court judge, Justice Mark Weinberg, took the courageous step of dissenting from his peers and created a two-hundred-page document in Pell’s defence, which formed the basis of his High Court appeal.
Cardinal Pell’s first night was spent at Kew in Melbourne with the Carmelite sisters. By an act of Providence, the relics of St. Therese of Lisieux, to whom the Cardinal has a great devotion, are being held in the monastery at the moment. While most Catholics aren’t able to venerate the relics due to coronavirus restrictions, the good Cardinal was able to do so in relative safety.
Melbourne awoke the next morning to the sight of hateful graffiti painted on the doors of St. Patrick’s Cathedral. This Church has also been the target of many protests and an insulting light show last year.
Also targeted was the Carmelite Monastery, where a child’s tricycle was found tied to the front gates in a disturbing act of reprisal.
Tensions are still very high in this state, where many pedophiles were allowed free reign over Catholic children for decades. Some of those responsible for allowing the abuse to continue have passed on to their eternal reward - or punishment - and those who have no faith to allow them to come to terms with the horror have made Cardinal Pell the focus of their angst.
The Cardinal left Melbourne on Wednesday, followed by invasive news-crews who filmed him at every opportunity, making it nigh impossible for him to experience his new-found freedom in peace.
The response from the Catholic hierarchy to Cardinal Pell’s release has been lukewarm. The bishops here are either afraid of being labelled a pedophile-enabler, or ashamed of the Church’s past failings or perhaps have simply forgotten what it is like to speak with integrity. The eagerness of some to remember the victims overshadows whatever gratitude they have for the Cardinal’s release. One wonders if they have the same sympathy for victims of Modernism, of appalling Liturgies and of the failed Catholic Education system.
By contrast, the Archbishop of Vietnam released a whole-hearted and loving response to the news: the Vietnamese community has given vocal support to the Cardinal from the beginning. Cardinal Pell has said that he was inspired by Cardinal Thuan Van Nguyen, who was imprisoned under Vietnam’s communist regime for thirteen years.
Since Tuesday morning, there have been calls from many of Pell’s supporters for a full investigation into the Victorian police and judiciary, which allowed this vendetta to gain full steam and which sent an obviously innocent man to prison. The Premier of Victoria, Daniel Andrews - that pro-abortion, pro-euthanasia, pro-LGBTI ‘Catholic’ - is coming under particular scrutiny.
This same man who made a secret deal with China and signed the state up for the Belt and Road Project, hasn’t held back his disdain for the opinion of the High Court. He is joined by other progressive politicians including Australia’s former Prime Minister, Julia Gillard. Their contempt for the Church is palpable and their fawning compassion for ‘the victims’ is proven hypocritical by their support for sexually-abusive education programmes in schools.
Pope Francis gave a vague and ambiguous remark before his Mass last Tuesday, offered just hours after the High Court decision was announced. He said that the Mass would be offered for "those people who suffer unjust sentences resulting from intransigence." While possibly referring to the case of Cardinal Pell - intransigence hardly describes the coordinated, multi-departmental vendetta to which he was prey - it is perhaps more likely that the Pope refers to those corrupt members of the Curia who suffered under objective and honest scrutiny at the hands of Cardinal Pell.
The most interesting consequence of this development in the Cardinal’s case will be the release of the 300,000-word manuscript that he wrote while behind bars. It is said to be a history of his experience over the past few years and will no doubt shine a light onto the corruption he witnessed while in Rome. Despite the media rhetoric, it isn’t young children who should be afraid of this good man. Rather it is those luxury-loving, corrupt prelates who are no doubt presently shaking in their cosy red shoes.
In the following, Ethan Nashexamines links between COVID-19 ‘solutions’ and social eugenics movements, including Bill Gates Snr and Planned Parenthood, the Gates Foundation and philanthropy deceptions, vested vaccine interests and engineering a pandemic.
Galton, whose cousin was Charles Darwin, hoped to ‘better humankind’ through the ‘science of improving the human species’ by selectively mating people with specific desirable hereditary traits.
Decades of research on ‘controlled breeding’, including through means of sterilization, soon became accepted mainstream science at the turn of the century and the eugenics movement was born.
Supporters of eugenics believe people inherit mental illness, criminal tendencies and even poverty, and that these conditions can be ‘bred out’ of the human gene pool through forced sterilization. Not surprisingly, ‘undesirable’ traits were concentrated in poor, uneducated and minority populations.
Many professionals in the scientific and biological fields rigorously researched ways to ‘improve the human race’ through means of eliminating these ‘negative traits’, and the movement would soon garner widespread political support — particularly in Australia.
As we have explored, the likes of Professor Richard Berry and growing Eugenics Societies of NSW and Victoria played a pivotal role in mass campaigns for laws allowing the establishment of a ”lethal chamber” to euthanise what these groups called ”the grosser types of our mental defectives”.
Following World War I, numerous eugenics-based ideologies were beginning to enter mainstream societies across the world. However, after Hitler would adopt these concepts and implement an aggressive form of the concept, the world grew sour and a new change was needed to continue.
CULTURAL MARXISM
The concepts of eugenics were not exorcised from Western thinking following World War II, rather, they went underground or and were reinvented by assuming more “compassionate” guises.
Julian Huxley’s significant contributions to the movement ensured that the underlying notions associated with eugenics would transform and continue into new social movements.
During the 1950s, these groups would re-define eugenics as ‘socially progressive’, with linkages to the newly formed and comprehensive welfare states that offered ‘solutions’ to poverty and disease.
Huxley adeptly associated the ‘new and modern’ eugenics movement with a range of reformist ideologies, such as the popularisation of birth control, the decriminalisation of homosexuality and abortion law reform. He described this process as “eugenic modernisation”.
The basic premise remained the same, however: it is far easier to eliminate the poor and the suffering, than it is to eliminate the complex and tenacious sources of their poverty or their suffering.
These people believe the masses are too moronic to govern themselves.
A plethora of new-age organisations and movements would arise during the era of ‘counter-culture’, and this ‘progression’ continued, the now-notorious Gates family would soon enter the picture.
BILL GATES SNR AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD
Photo: WUM
The key to understanding Bill Gates’ exposure to eugenic concepts is to trace his family past.
Bill Gates’ father, William H. Gates, Sr., was a prominent banker and a lawyer in Preston Gates & Ellis. He also presided over many bar associations, organisation boards and started the Technology Alliance — a regional push to expand technology-based jobs throughout the 20th century.
The company spread from beginnings in Cold Spring Harbor genetics and virology labs on Long Island and Berlin, to today become one of the largest organisations in the US. Rockefeller-Bayar Co., BASF and Hoechst petrochemical-pharmaceutical consortium were all initial funders of the group.
Make no mistake: Planned Parenthood was built on population control schemes — allied with the same groups who wanted genetic hierarchy laws to ‘preserve’ humanity and who sought to ‘beautify’ countries by stopping the “unfit” from reproducing.
In their 2014 Annual Report, the pro-abortion and anti-family group reported seeing over 2.5 million patients in over 4 million clinical visits, including 324,000 abortions. The group claims to be a proponent of ‘free choice’, yet it is a eugenics front organisation in disguise.
Planned Parent has recently gone through their second executive in just eight months, after sacking President Leana Wen for daring to suggest the group should focus more on women’s health.
Does this sound like a group that dedicated to improving society? This one showdown revealed a genuine rift in the organization and a simple truth: promoting ‘women’s health’ was always a cover.
Bill Gates proudly speaks on his father’s involvement on the board of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on the concept that most human beings are just “reckless breeders”.
Gates’ father would take the concepts learned at Planned Parenthood and incorporate them into building the foundational blueprint for a new era of philanthropy activities that remain to this day.
The methodologies have evolved leaps-and-bounds since the early formation of the movement, however the objective remains the same. This time, the new multifaceted approach would see the philanthropist group partner with powerful United Nations organizations like the World Health Organisation (WHO) and UNICEF.
Today, the group is focused on many areas that drive continued work across the world. These activities have given birth to new forms of technological, eugenic endeavours.
The organisation is simply continuing the Gates family legacy of trying to dominate and control the world’s systems, including in the areas of technology, medicine and now agriculture.
In 2010, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation purchased 500,000 shares in Monsanto valued at more than $23 million. This is when it became abundantly clear that the so-called benevolent charity is up to something other than ‘eradicating’ disease and feeding the world’s poor.
The evidence that GMOs cause disease has been piling up for decades, as the list of countries banning their import and cultivation grows. Bill openly promotes GMOs as the ‘answer’ to world hunger, but many think this is in exactly the same vein as when the British Army handed small pox-infested blankets out to desperate American Indians during the French and Indian War.
Melinda Gates has also made ‘women’s issues’ one of the top priorities for their philanthropic work. This includes the decision to elevate contraception-promotion and population control as “arguably the single-most important part of her work”. She has been openly criticised for these moves.
In 2017, the Gates Foundation pledged another $375 million for ‘family planning’, with the goal of providing contraception to 120 million women across the world, particularly in developing countries.
This emphasis on blanketing developing countries with artificial contraception for which women aren’t asking for reeks of social engineering and paternalistic eugenicist thinking.
The fact that couples in developing countries often desire and value large families means nothing to many Western elitist philanthropists: the not-so-subliminal underlying presumption is that women who desire large families simply don’t know what’s good for them. As such, they need to be educated and ‘encouraged’ with large-scale, foreign-funded advertising companies and coercion.
Now that we have explored the history of the Gates family, influences and aims of philanthropist philosophies and modern eugenics programs across the world, let’s explore the relatable picture.
BILL GATES AND VACCINES
Bill Gates needs no introduction. He is one of the most influential Polyergus of all time. For 25 years, he has controlled what has grown to become a multibillion-dollar colossus, Microsoft, and made himself one of the richest men in the world. The tech world was largely born through Gates.
He accomplished this feat not by inventing new technology, but by taking existing technology, adapting it to a ‘specific market’, and then dominating that market.
In recent years, Gates has turned a good deal of his attention towards philanthropy by creating the largest private foundation in the world, with over $46 billion in assets. He has secured billions of dollars in contributions from other wealthy benefactors such as Warren Buffett, and is primarily dedicated to ‘enhancing healthcare’ and ‘alleviating poverty’ across the world.
Bill Gates is heavily involved in development of new vaccines, as well as ‘forecasting’ international health challenges of tomorrow (such as preparing for epidemics), and works beyond the scope of national oversight and accountability in most cases.
He has spent years involved in the vaccine-manufacturing process, including quality control and clinical evaluation. This understanding has allowed Gates to ‘advise’ vaccine development programs and fund research into new areas of innovation for multiple disease programs:
Source: B&MGF
Gates invests in expertise and platform technologies that help us make vaccines faster, ‘better’ and cheaper, in addition to also investing in numerous education and training programs to ensure that knowledge around vaccines is created, shared and retained. Some examples of this include:
Today, GAVI has grown significantly. The group brings together developing country and donor governments (including Australia), the World Health Organization, UNICEF, the World Bank, the vaccine industry, research and technical agencies, civil society and other private philanthropists.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has donated $1.56 billion to the alliance’s 2016-2020 strategic period as of March 2019, and continues to advise the group on key business decisions.
Gates heavy involvement in the vaccine industry, in addition to continuing the eugenicists visions of the ‘social’ reformation, was fundamental in framing his positive public perception on the matter.
Considered a ‘hero’ in the fight to develop new technologies against growing diseases, the stage had now been set for Gates to become the new ‘go to’ voice if a pandemic was to ever break out.
COVID-19: A PLAN-DEMIC?
‘PREDICTING’ AN OUTBREAK
The Microsoft co-founder has hinted on multiple occasions over the past decade that the potential for something like the coronavirus that would soon arise and the world must be ‘ready’.
In 2015, Bill Gates gave a TED Talk titled, The next outbreak? We’re not ready, which is being shared widely online in recent weeks given the impact of COVID-19 across the world.
The part of the talk that’s making rounds online shows Gates explaining that while the greatest threat to humanity when he was growing up was nuclear war, the greatest threat now is a virus:
“If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. Not missiles, but microbes.”
Rather, through these ‘cryptic’ messages, Gates was positioning himself in a positive light to connect with the public psyche. If something was to happen, ‘Gates would know the solution!’, they will cry.
Did Gates know something we didn’t know in advance? Emerging evidence suggest this ‘pandemic’ was foretold by the billionaire, which now serves as the mechanism to further carry out the agenda.
EVENT 201
On October 18, 2019, The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, which is described on the group’s website as “a high-level pandemic exercise” carried out in New York.
The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be ‘necessary’ during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences:
“Experts agree that it is only a matter of time before one of these epidemics becomes global — a pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences. A severe pandemic, which becomes ‘Event 201’, would require reliable cooperation among several industries, national governments, and key international institutions.”
The group claims they did not ‘predict’ the coronavirus, despitemodelling their pandemic under the same name. However, when examining their documents, striking similarities begin to emerge:
“Event 201 simulated an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen was modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.
There is no possibility of a vaccine being available in the first year.”
Furthermore, the Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation funded a research center in England called the Pirbright Institute, which specialises in the study of viruses that affect farm animals, and viruses which transfer from animals to people. They own a very similar patent for a type of coronavirus affecting animals.
The world fell for the deception, hook line and sinker. Now, nations are crying out for a ‘solution’ to the growing COVID-19 ‘crisis’ and Bill Gates (not surprisingly) has emerged at the head of the pack.
GATES TO THE RESCUE
Bill Gates is now the talk of the town, and in a recent interview, he told The Daily Show that his foundation was funding the construction of factories for seven coronavirus vaccine ‘candidates’.
He says the foundation would end up picking only one or two of the seven, meaning billions of dollars spent on manufacturing would be abandoned. However, spending a few billion to capitalise on the growing $35 billion vaccine market seems like a calculated investment.
So, a man who has profited largely off vaccine development for years and also held ‘simulations’ of pandemic outbreaks is now cashing in on the chase to develop a COVID-19 vaccine? How fitting.
Gates ultimate influence in this unfolding plan can be found in the instructions given in recent weeks.
THE ‘ONLY WAY OUT’
Bill Gates now has a net worth of $97.8 billion. Yet, being the ‘relatable’ person that he is, took to reddit for an Ask Me Anything on the COVID-19 pandemic. He would share his thoughts on ‘how best to deal’ with the outbreak and explored possible long-term effects on the world.
Gates said that broad vaccination for COVID-19 will need to become available “before you can be completely safe”. Until then, according to his claims, there’s a risk that communities could rebound unless they continue to practice strict social distancing and quarantines to see case numbers level off.
Gates said he doesn’t think large gatherings will be able to resume until widespread vaccination has taken place, as the ‘risks would outweigh the benefits’ of such events:
World leaders also agree with Gates’ timeline and perspectives. Shortly after doing the media rounds, the Australian government hinted at the fact society will be in lockdown until a vaccine is developed. This was soon followed by the New South Wales government and others.
Furthermore, Gates called for a “national tracking system similar to South Korea”, saying that “in Seattle, the University of Washington is providing thousands of tests per day, but no one is connected to a national tracking system”. He said that whenever there is a positive test, it should be used to understand where the disease is and whether we need to strengthen the social distancing.
In the future, he has floated the idea of ‘vaccine certificates’ to show proof-of-vaccination following the widespread rollout of COVID-19 products. This would be a new requirement for international and domestic travel, and is tipped to further expand to all facets of life.
Given the context detailed in this feature piece, do you trust the intentions of this man?
Gates has a rich history of eugenics influence and partakes in activities across the world that further progress the aims of the original movement, albeit in disguise.
Such is the story of the Dehumanization of Humanity. The ‘death of god’ lead to parasites believing they were gods, and this premise serves as the underlying force driving the transhumanist era.
If a COVID-19 vaccine uses strains of an actual virus, as many do, in order to encourage the body to build immunization, subjects who receive the vaccine will be carriers of that virus.
Bill Gates, and the forces that drive this puppet, are pushing the world towards a choice: Take the COVID-19 vaccine and deal with the health consequences, or refuse and be denied basic services and after being labelled as a ‘health threat’. Take the jab or be targeted.
I know where I stand.
Will you be lining up to receive the newly developed Gates-funded vaccine?
